Texas officials have turned over the state’s voter roll to the U.S. Justice Department, according to a spokesperson for the Texas Secretary of State’s Office, complying with the Trump administration’s demands for access to data on millions of voters across the country.

The Justice Department last fall began asking all 50 states for their voter rolls — massive lists containing significant identifying information on every registered voter in each state — and other election-related data. The Justice Department has said the effort is central to its mission of enforcing election law requiring states to regularly maintain voter lists by searching for and removing ineligible voters.

Alicia Pierce, a spokesperson for the Texas Secretary of State’s Office, told Votebeat and The Texas Tribune that the state had sent its voter roll, which includes information on the approximately 18.4 million voters registered in Texas, to the Justice Department on Dec. 23.

  • Asafum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This is exactly why I changed my registration to independent in 2016. I knew this shit was coming and I for one am not willingly putting myself on a registered “enemies list” for a fascist fuckwit to use against me. Unfortunately in NY that means I can’t vote in primaries…

    • minorkeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      That may not help though, if you don’t support them, you’re a target. You don’t have to be dem to be targeted you just have to be a problem.

        • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          My point is that it’s not stored as part of your voter registration data. We have open primaries and they record which you voted in so that you can only vote in primary runoffs if you voted in that same year’s original primary.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Wonder what they would make of switching back and forth between primaries election to election…

          • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            In terms of campaign analytics and polling profiling that would make you an independent voter and likely to receive attention from the campaigns you are eligible to vote for/against.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Well, more from a hypothetical suppression perspective. I certainly know I get a lot of unwanted mailings for elections from all sides since I change primaries based on either whom I want to win, or alternatively if there’s someone I really don’t want to win and need to vote for a competitor, weighted against the relative likelihood of the vote mattering in that particular race in my particular area…

              • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                I think it would make you a “see how they vote after the first wave” on their suppression schedule. Like if it scares you into voting “correctly” after all the reliable “wrong” voters are purged … then you can keep voting.

                • jj4211@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Of course, it’s funny because they have no idea if I’m voting ‘for’ the party in question or voting to try to keep the party in question from putting up someone like Trump, even if I still want them to lose either way.

                  • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    I think in '24 the Republican primary ballot had a measure for closing the primaries, so I think they’re getting wise.

      • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Might actually be a good idea if everyone registered as Republican. Then there’s no way to tell who’s really going to vote for them. Hah, sorry I forgot there probably won’t be any more votes.

      • Asafum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Interesting, Barron Von J just told me Texas doesn’t have party affiliation on their registrations.

        Not sure who to trust.

        • insufferableninja@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          That is technically correct, but immaterial from a practical standpoint. The party affiliation is per calendar year - when you vote in one party’s primary you are “registered” as that party for a year, so you can’t vote in the other parties’ primaries. So the primaries are nominally open unlike states with party affiliation on the registration, but practically there’s no difference from closed primaries.