South Florida cops claimed they were “forced to fire” at a 32-year-old Black man named Donald Taylor in August because he was armed and would not follow commands.

But newly surfaced video contradicts those claims, showing the Black man walking away from cops with his hands raised to his sides showing no gun in his hand when a Hollywood police officer fired a single shot as Taylor had his back turned to the cops, killing him.

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Am I reading this correctly? That if you comply they still unalive you?

    Edit: every single reply to this comment is to inform me they don’t like a word. Not one of them addresses the actual message of lethal compliance. If this were Facebook that would make sense but Lemmy isn’t MAGA land so I’m a bit confused by all this boomer shaped deflection.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      From only this posted article, he didn’t comply. He was murdered for ignoring them

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You don’t get to say what you want without other people being allowed to say what they want back.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yes, when you comply they might still kill you

      Having said that, please stop using that “special language” or whatever the hell it is that you’re using

      It’s called killing murdering, etc. “unaliving” is just dumb and shouldn’t be used in a normal conversation

      • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Thank you for at least addressing the topic before attacking the language. I do actually appreciate it.

    • FatVegan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      A tiktok adult calling everyone a boomer who disagrees with their brainrot speech is pretty funny

    • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      There’s a large chunk of Lemmy that’s barely literate. Using words that might confuse them hurts their brains.

    • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      16 hours ago

      That if you comply they still unalive you?

      There’s a reason they are required to wear body cam. They’re the same brood that harbored the KKK.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      lol, calling people complaining about you not speaking plainly “boomer”.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I agree that it’s perfectly cromulent where it lends meaning. But in this case it’s just not sing passive verb when thenacirivenverb was more meaningful and accurate

        • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I personally hate when people use “unalive” rather than “kill” or “murder” but it’s not a battle I care to fight. With everything else happening right now, people that would focus on the word are shit-stains.

          • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Whataboutism is for people incapable of holding more than one thought in their head at once

        • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          I don’t know, it sounds to me like you’re trying to sanewash murder by using a “tamer” word than straight up “murder” -which this is, we agree on that. I get that’s not your intention, but that’s what it sounds like to me

          • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            The actual explanation is way simpler. They’ve adapted their vocabulary to moronic social media’s censorship bots.

              • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                I’m not totally sure, but I don’t think they’re explicitly censored, more of a shadow-ban via algorithm (for the folks that give a shit about that kind of thing).

        • OshagHennessey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          68
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Don’t speak the words our corporate oppressors demand. They want you to believe concepts like sex, murder, drugs, and suicide are too adult, too dirty to be discussed explicitly in public.

          Don’t believe them. Say the words you mean. Use language that’s accurate, not what’s preferred by oligarchs for “marketing reasons”.

            • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              not trying to. just trying to imply that in order for the youth to listen i have to talk to them in a way they’d wanna hear

          • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            18 hours ago

            My favorite part of this is how every reply is someone butthurt about the word I used and doing everything in their power to avoid the issue by focusing on the language and not the message.

            • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Yea, using a cutesy, made-up, baby word to describe fucking murder is a bit distracting. Who the fuck would have guessed?

            • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              edit-2
              18 hours ago

              ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I think the reason you’re awash in upvotes for your original comment is because it’s simply a known thing for most of us and we don’t have anything to add. It just is what we know and what we’ve been fighting against my entire adult life. Conservatives will push all kinds of propaganda that doesn’t map to reality like “obey the law”, “just comply”, “all lives matter”. The police will shoot first and ask questions later, and those questions won’t have anything to do with law enforcement.

              But there’s been a VERY long progression of reducing the amount of inter-generational connectivity and making sure that we barely even speak the same languages or dialects and some of us got caught off gaurd by your use of neotalk that’s been coaxed into reality by corporate social media platforms censoring certain forms of speech critical of the systems of torture we exist under. For example, what we today call cPTSD 100 years ago was called shell shock. Then it was called combat fatigue. Then combat stress reaction. Then it was PTSD. After that it was divided into cPTSD. And that’s an example of the terminology changing for reasons that we can very much find ways that it actually is positive. Each shift expanded the definition to include more people and more experiences. It’s easy to find the justification that while it divides successive combat veterans and how they talk about their own traumatic experiences and how the systems of torture that exist have broken them.

              Most of us find it harder to find this silver lining in neotalk from corporate social media platforms. We just see our dialect eroding beneath us. But you don’t. And our generation has to do more to reach out to you and listen to you so that you have any reason to listen to us. So while I personally disagree, I refuse to let myself be upset about it, or butthurt as you put it (given that I’m not upset, I’m not even close to butthurt). All I can do is point out that inter-generational connectivity is intentionally broken by our oppressors by manipulating how we use language and hope that someday you’ll have this experience ready to help you talk to a younger generation who speaks differently from you. I hope you do so with grace, love, and patience.

              That’s all I was getting at

            • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              It’s hard to say something profound about something so ugly and sad. It’s easy to critique language so you will have a lot more of what is easy. I’m angry at the issue but I don’t know what to say about it myself.

              • 5gruel@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Wait what, why would it be hard? Ugly and sad things are probably the most important to talk about with more weight and significance than happy topics.

    • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I was on your side until you said that the hate you were getting was from a specific group. Would you even be commenting if a Boomer was “unalived”?

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Exactly. There’s no incentive to comply. They completely gave away their authority. Just kill them all.