A federal court has upheld the new congressional map approved by California voters last month, giving Democrats a chance to counter the nationwide redistricting effort led by President Trump and his Republican allies.

The court challenge to the redistricting plan had been brought by the California Republican Party and the U.S. Department of Justice. The court found that the new district map did not violate laws against racial gerrymandering.

The Republicans argued that the new map was motivated by a desire to increase the voting power of Latinos. The court, in a two-to-one ruling, rejected that claim, noting that voters approved the measure, called “Proposition 50” and there was no evidence they acted on racial grounds.

  • NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Place your bets!

    jazzy background music starts playing

    • Supreme Court allows the California gerrymander: Pays 2:1
    • Supreme Court allows the Texas gerrymander: Pays 1:2
    • Supreme Court overturns California gerrymandering but upholds Texas gerrymandering: Pays 1:1
    • Supreme Court overturns Texas gerrymandering but upholds California gerrymandering: Pays 100:1
    • 2026 election not held as scheduled due to Trump activities: Pays 4:1

    Bets must be placed in the form of cookies 🍪

    • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      What are the odds on Clarence Thomas being found doing some truly heinous things in the Epstein files, refusing to step down, and publishing an opinion that the founders really wanted Trump to become God-KKKing of the US?

    • Asafum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Because they always do. It’s why Republicans have fought so hard to gain full control of it. None of the lesser courts matter anymore

    • bus_factor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I could have sworn they already did a couple months ago, stating it was too close to the election or something? Maybe I misunderstood.

      • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        They fall back to the Purcell principle when it’s convenient and didn’t get involved in Texas redistricting a full year before the next election, but when California does the same thing (via the legal avenues) all of a sudden it’s not too close to an election and they’ll likely mess with California’s redistricting. I despise the corruption of the court, but they could at least have the decency of keeping the corruption consistent.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I think they pocket-affirmed the Texas map that had been blocked by a Reagan appointee.

  • Tehbaz@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Doesn’t matter anymore. Trump is starting WW3 over Greenland now, there will not be any further elections in the US.

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      At this point. I feel like we’ll annex Canada before the midterms and he’ll just be like “ah, can’t have elections. Wouldn’t be fair for the new states. We gotta delay until they are established. For fairness and such”.

      The useless Democrats at that point are just full fascist supporters. It sounds ridiculous but this is one of many reasons for a non election I could see occuring. Among others.

      • Tehbaz@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        At least whoever survives the war will be able to drag Trump and his cabinet out of their bunkers for Nuremburg 2: orange boogaloo.

      • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        “The Canadians are putting up a lot of resistance after we butchered every single one of them in Vancouver. Oh, and I would like to remind you all that I enjoyed pulling my Canadian guest apart in the Oval Office. I’m sure you all did too, since I broadcasted it live. Inappropriate content? Not on my watch. Oh, and since the Canadians are blowing up our ICE agents, I’m going to have to cancel the elections. The Canadians will try to mess with the results, and we can’t have that, you know? We’ll resume elections when all the Canadians have been exterminated like the dogs they are.”