Would it kill Democrats to not just be Republicans from the 90s?

JFC Jeffries is actively harmful to the Democratic party. He brings nothing of value to the position and his association and role as one of its mouthpieces drags down the party image for people actually trying to fight for democracy.

And the exploitation supposedly began while he was president and surrounded by Secret Service and various aids and grifters. He was golfing all the time, but it seems like quite a bold move to start up new sex crimes when you’re one of the most watched people in the world with nearly infinite resources available should someone come forward with a damning criminal accusation.

He is an audacious piece of shit willing to do crimes in public though. And he hasn’t ever been punished for it.

So like the same 50% opposition as in the US. This kind of seems like we’re all living under the same propaganda and international political machines.

It’s not real though. Democratic woman are hot as fuck. Their example of an ugly Democratic woman is someone no one ever talks about who’s in her 80s when AOC is one of the most famous Democratic politicians. The whole Squad is beautiful. It’s just the sort detached from reality brain rot that propagates on conservative social media.

You gotta wonder if the “friend” did it in collaboration with Gallego. From the relayed conversation it doesn’t sound like he’d be scandalized by misogyny. Arizona Dems seem to have a perpetual hard-on for demonstrating how much they hate their party.

Yeah, it was as brutal as any other shooting. Do cops shooting kids ever get described as “brutal”?

It’s not like he was beaten to death with a tire iron, or denied treatment and left to a slow and agonizing death that also leaves your family in ruins.

Alternate story: Trump judge said the previous lines were too egregious to be legal, but then chose the most conservative map presented by the Special Master.

The kid based his map on the racially gerrymandered map and turned off racial considerations in the redesign. The map minimally tweaked a racial gerrymander, but because he didn’t use racism in his tweak he thinks it’s not racially gerrymandered. Garbage in, garbage out.

The CIA agents who directed him also shouldn’t be allowed to enter or remain in the United States.

Republicans are saying the same thing.

“Venezuela for the American oil companies will be a field day because it will be more than a trillion dollars in economic activity.”

“American companies can go in and fix the oil rigs and everything that has to do with the Venezuelan petroleum companies, with oil and the derivatives.”

“The Venezuelans have the largest reserves of oil in the world, more than Saudi Arabia. This is going to be a windfall for us when it comes to fossil fuels.”

They’re just saying it out loud.

https://www.newsweek.com/gop-rep-says-us-may-go-in-to-venezuela-11102970

Republicans are saying the same thing.

“Venezuela for the American oil companies will be a field day because it will be more than a trillion dollars in economic activity.”

“American companies can go in and fix the oil rigs and everything that has to do with the Venezuelan petroleum companies, with oil and the derivatives.”

“The Venezuelans have the largest reserves of oil in the world, more than Saudi Arabia. This is going to be a windfall for us when it comes to fossil fuels.”

They’re just saying it out loud.

https://www.newsweek.com/gop-rep-says-us-may-go-in-to-venezuela-11102970

Andrew Yang’s centrist party with no principles? What is this doing here?

That’s just where you put programs that sound good but no one wants to spend the money to actually accomplish them. 2050 might be the end of the world, but it’d be because all the stuff we needed to do to head it off were given “we’ll get to it eventually” deadlines.

In that they’ll discover a task that sounds easy will be practically impossible to accomplish?

Using the best models as synthetic data is mostly pointless. You’re just going to recreate all of its biases and failures in a degraded copy. The whole point of open source software is being able to analyze the source code to learn how it works and understand and ideally remove its weaknesses.

Open weights doesn’t let you do that, and what research it enables is mostly just tinkering around the edges. If someone trained a network, but it kept saying racist stuff, you can’t figure out why it’s racist or rebuild it without the racism from weights alone. Just the weights is like having a binary. Maybe nice to have a gratis app to use, but not really open.

Open-source AI is the data, not the weights. Weights alone isn’t useless, but it’s not a platform to truly understand and modify a network. No one wants to open their data though, because that’s both what gives them a competitive edge and it would be an admission of widespread copyright violations.

I’m surprised they didn’t cancel the project for being woke.

AOC (or Mandami) is not the critical approver to primary Jeffries. Her being publicly at war with the minority leader of her party for the next year doesn’t do anything useful, so let her avoid answering. It doesn’t mean she’s a class traitor or has given up on progressivism. Nancy Pelosi “endorsed” progressive Democrats all the time. It didn’t mean she was their friend and it didn’t make centrists any more likely to vote for them in a primary. And this isn’t even an endorsement, it’s just dodging the question.

So if she’s not a terrorist and didn’t do anything criminal, that sure sounds like the officer shooting her is a criminal act.

It should. This is straight up eugenics. No one should be making genetic fitness a priority when proposing state policy.