One day during his first term, Donald Trump summoned a top aide to discuss a new idea. “Trump called me down to the Oval Office,” John Bolton, national security adviser in 2018, told the Guardian. “He said a prominent businessman had just suggested the US buy Greenland.”
It was an extraordinary proposal. And it originated from a longtime friend of the president who would go on to acquire business interests in the Danish territory.
The businessman, Bolton learned, was Ronald Lauder. Heir to a makeup fortune – the global cosmetics brand Estée Lauder – he had known Trump, a fellow wealthy New Yorker, for more than 60 years.
Bolton said he discussed the Greenland proposition with Lauder. After the billionaire’s intervention, a White House team began to explore ways to increase US sway in the vast Arctic territory controlled by Denmark.
Trump’s renewed pursuit of Lauder’s idea during his second term is typical of how the president operates, Bolton said. “Bits of information that he hears from friends, he takes them as truth and you can’t shake his opinion.”
I wouldn’t take the word of John Bolton as worth anything more than toilet paper. I think the Peter Thiel connection to Greenland is much more worth discussion, and it’s the main reason why Vance is VP.
Both threads of reasoning can be true simultaneously; the veracity of one doesn’t negate the veracity of the other.
Normally true, but again, John Bolton. I’d probably trust him on mustache upkeep though.
He doesn’t really have a reason to lie about it. What would be the point?
How well do you know who John Bolton is?
I know he’s a right-wing asshole. But seriously, what would be his motive for lying about something like this? What would he gain? Maybe there’s an angle I hadn’t considered.
I can’t read his mind. As he said, coups aren’t easy. He puts the term “right wing asshole” to shame. He’s so bad, I’m surprised he doesn’t have a Nobel Peace Prize.