I’m not a lawyer, but my understanding is that US law doesn’t typically operate on technicalities like this. Would the “reasonable man” believe the bumper sticker was an offer to any passers-by to search the car and take any guns they find? I’ll answer my own question — definitely not.
The law feels like programming, if you follow the rules you can do whatever, but it’s more like an rpg with a game master. The moment you start bending the rules like a pretzel to start screwing people over, the humans running things will step in to stop you. That’s probably for the best, we don’t want to live in a world where “technically” always wins the day.
I always wondered if it would hold up in court.
If you had a “come and take them” bumper sticker, a gun in the glove box, and forgot to lock your car. Could I legally take it?
The better question is whether police could use this as “consent” to search your vehicle.
I’m not a lawyer, but my understanding is that US law doesn’t typically operate on technicalities like this. Would the “reasonable man” believe the bumper sticker was an offer to any passers-by to search the car and take any guns they find? I’ll answer my own question — definitely not.
The law feels like programming, if you follow the rules you can do whatever, but it’s more like an rpg with a game master. The moment you start bending the rules like a pretzel to start screwing people over, the humans running things will step in to stop you. That’s probably for the best, we don’t want to live in a world where “technically” always wins the day.
hopefully and usually they will stop someone for bending and testing the laws, as you can see by orange man not always