The law was clear: Donald Trumpās Department of Justice was required to disclose all investigative files on Jeffrey Epstein by 19 December 2025, with rare exceptions.
One month after this deadline mandated by Congressās Epstein Files Transparency Act, however, Trumpās justice department has not complied with this law, prompting questions about when ā and whether ā authorities will ever release investigative documents about the late sex offender.
Justice department attorneys said in a 5 January Manhattan court filing that they had posted approximately 12,285 to DoJās website, equating to some 125,575 pages, under this legislationās requirements. They said in this same letter that justice department staff had identified āmore than 2 million documents potentially responsive to the Act that are in various phases of reviewā.
That these DoJās disclosures apparently comprise a drop in the bucket ā and have done little to shed light on how Epstein operated with apparent impunity for years ā has roiled survivorsā advocates and lawmakers. They include attorney Spencer Kuvin, who has represented dozens of Epsteinās survivors.
They note that the Department of Justice has also flouted another requirement of this act, which requires that the attorney general provide a report identifying ācategories of records released and withheld and summarizing all redactions and their legal basesā within 15 days of their disclosure deadline.
āTo date, no such report has been provided. Without it, there is no authoritative accounting of what records exist, what has been withheld, or why, making effective oversight and judicial review far more difficult,ā they wrote. āPut simply, the DOJ cannot be trusted with making mandatory disclosures under the Act.ā



(smart) people really donāt care about trump, he will be short-lived even if he makes it through this 2nd term. itās about cutting out the rot behind him, cults of personality rarely extend past the cult-head.
I really do care about Trump, and I donāt care whether you think Iām smart.
He may be old, and even unwell, but the amount of damage heās doing every day / week / month is obscene. Just in the last week heās done significant lasting harm to trade relations with Europe.
If he withdraws the US from NATO he will have done irreparable damage to global security.
I donāt have a lot of faith that the harm heās doing can be undone.
i just dont think itāll be materially different with vance in place of trump, the national distraction/embarrassment aspect might be less but the bts christofacist shit would be much more precise
You might be right, I dont know.
Trump seems to have absolute control of the republican party. Its not clear whether Vance would have that same grip.