• FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    In my area, the cameras revnue was used to make those roadway improvements. IMO its a good middle ground. Updating roads to safer standards is a massive financial commitment & this ensure people speeding front more of that bill. Speeders rack up our tax dollars in enforcement costs and emergency services costs like healthcare which is less money to spend on road safety. Your city making just 1 of their stroads safer would completely decimate an annual budget and they’d still have a lot more roads to improve.

    • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Certainly there is a chicken vs egg financial challenge, but when antagonizing drivers ends public support, and they’re banned (as in TFA), now there’s no road safety improvements.

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        People want to deny it, but the cameras themselves were a safety improvement. They reduced speed. Maybe not for every single car but certainly enough to make a statistical difference. The cameras my areas used were mobile and the speed reduction would linger for weeks to months after the camera had moved.