Gaza will be a ‘beautiful piece of property’, says Donald Trump as images unveiled at the signing of the president’s ‘board of peace’ in Davos

    • LumiNocta@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      How is this relevant, he’s not in office. Trump is not less of a corrupt fraud because of someone else.

      • 7101334@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s relevant because people on this website are desperate to pretend Democrats are in any way redeemable, a notion which should be cut down at every opportunity.

        • LumiNocta@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Nu-uh you are comparing two very different situations as if what Biden did or intended is even close to what trump is doing.

      • mrdown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Crimes do not disappear. Would you also be ok with Trump not being held accountable once he is no longer president?

      • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        36
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        He was in office for the first year and change.

        Your reply is intellectually dishonest, and you know it.

        Also, your last few comments are replies to me. Are you stalking me or something? Given that it’s on different subs, seems like more than just chance.

          • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            Apparently important enough for you to leave a reply to two of my comments.

            /not sure how your comment is even relevant to this discussion, but whatever

        • Carl@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Report the stalking. That is what I did for mine. They might get banned from the community, or just have their comments deleted. Some people are just toxic.

          • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Lol, you aren’t the same person (unless you’re an alt?).

            My point is that getting a few comments from the same person on different subs that are all snide or bad faith / specious arguments is going to raise suspicions. I am unlikely to have even noticed if the comments didn’t come off like someone trying to argue for the sake of arguing.

            Thanks for the bit of levity.

            • Zorque@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 day ago

              As opposed to bringing up specious arguments like “what about this guy who is longer in power” in threads about trying to actually accomplish something? Or arguments about how something doesn’t apply to a situation because it doesn’t specifically apply to you?

              Perhaps your own arguments are made for arguments sake and others just respond in kind. Take stock of your own life before blaming others for your shortcomings.

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yours is fear mongering and whattaboutism. The problem we currently face is not someone who is no longer actively in politics, and constantly bringing it up as though dealing with it now is going to make any kind of difference is intellectually dishonest.

          We need to deal with the situation we have now, not what has happened before. Doing otherwise is little more than distraction.

          And as far as my last few comments… perhaps you just make a lot of comments worth replying to? I honestly dont pay that close attention to it.

          • 7101334@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            The problem we currently face is not someone who is no longer actively in politics

            It’ll be a problem in 2 years when Democrats run an unwinnable candidate like Holocaust Harris again and JD Vance wins the election.

            Would you rather talk about it now or then?

            We need to deal with the situation we have now, not what has happened before.

            “There is nothing to be learned from the past, we must be strictly reactionary.” Truly a liberal approach, I’ll give you that much.

            • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 minutes ago

              I do not understand why you are calling “holocaust Harris” someone that wasn’t against selling weapons used by someone else with the explicit intention of doing a genocide (she knew but she was ok with that) BUT you’re NOT doing the same to the other one, which instead is actively planning the final solution???

    • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Biden is likely a true believer like most democrats (and republicans for that matter), Trump is the one who needs to be paid off.

    • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      He did it for the love of the party

      (He was also not the one in power when this started in the 40s, your point is moot)

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      He was a true believer in Zionism. But he was also the largest AIPAC recipient which didn’t hurt.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Didn’t you hear? Genocide Joe was successfuly stopped, that’s why everything is going so great now

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      He is just a cynical sell out, he’s an old dog, and rolling over for treats is his go to move, along with barking at the left and prostrating himself before the right. He’s a submissive pee-er too. He was chosen for those known quantities.