Nowhere in that article did it even imply that the Supreme Court would support warrantless entry into a person’s home. In fact, it said that this policy contradicts many years of court precedent.
This is just more legal manipulation of the Constitution. Just have some psychopath MAGA traitor INVENT his own law, write it down (because he’s one of the few that can), and all the rest of them can wink and agree that since it is written down, and called a MEMO, it is perfectly legal, and a reasonable basis for an entire predatory and parasitic paramilitary enforcement operation. It is NOT.
However, they will proceed as of it is, without tipping anyone off for as long as possible, and when it finally gets discovered, and challenged in court, they’ll slowly drag it through the legal process, all the whole continuing to follow the policy as if it is a perfectly legal and reasonable policy that is just having a little regulatory snafu, as peoples’ lives get systematically destroyed, along with all of America.
Nowhere in that article did it even imply that the Supreme Court would support warrantless entry into a person’s home. In fact, it said that this policy contradicts many years of court precedent.
This is just more legal manipulation of the Constitution. Just have some psychopath MAGA traitor INVENT his own law, write it down (because he’s one of the few that can), and all the rest of them can wink and agree that since it is written down, and called a MEMO, it is perfectly legal, and a reasonable basis for an entire predatory and parasitic paramilitary enforcement operation. It is NOT.
However, they will proceed as of it is, without tipping anyone off for as long as possible, and when it finally gets discovered, and challenged in court, they’ll slowly drag it through the legal process, all the whole continuing to follow the policy as if it is a perfectly legal and reasonable policy that is just having a little regulatory snafu, as peoples’ lives get systematically destroyed, along with all of America.