• NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Also worth noting not are people on a bicycle are “cyclists”, just like not all people in a car are “race car drivers”.

      There’s various types of bicycle, such as riding for pleasure, casual riding, entertainment, or racing. Not to mention the various ages of bicyclists. These distinctions are important, just as much as safe well designed infrastructure for all roadway users, weather they are on foot, or a bicycle, or in a car.

      A example of “cyclists” 1000054562

      A example of causal bicyclists 1000054564

      • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        The word cyclist if perfectly fine to describe someone who rides a bicycle without any conotations about racing.

        • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          I do think it’s fine, though I do want to point out the word “cyclist” does carry some “weight” to it especially in North America.

          For example a individual like Forester would disagree, this dudes “studies” are essentially what all North American city planners follow regrettably. Link to a summary of this topic.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRPduRHBhHI

          Its also why its so hard to explain why dedicated separate bike infrastructure is so important. Most city planners for some reason forget that children and older individuals cycle.