President Donald Trump is suing the Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department, and is seeking $10 billion in damages.
Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and the Trump Organization sued the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department in federal court in Miami on Thursday, following the leak of their tax returns by a former IRS employee in 2019 and 2020.
LOL OMG broad day light THEFT of US treasury.
You mean to suggest Scott Bessent and Pam Bondi won’t treat this lawsuit fairly and impartially? How dare you!
It’s not a criminal complaint, it’s civil. The doj has fuck all to do with civil matters.
The DOJ defends civil litigation against the federal government as well.
The oig hires outside for politically involved cases. The doj has to stay at a distance and that doesn’t negate the obligation to provide proof of actual damages.
That sounds like a very reasonable custom and norm for an independent, non-conflicted DOJ. (Sorry, deadpan is hard online.)
It’s not custom it’s legal precedent, if they ignore it that just means eventually he’s up for clawback with interest and any profit.
Thanks, this is not a sealion question: do you have something to further read about this or support this? I’d like to understand how the DOJ is actually bound. The DOJ has been run by Bondi as Trump’s private law firm, regardless of their mandate, and I expect that to continue.
My initial suspicion is that anything short of a Supreme Court ruling (and possibly not even that) will force compliance by the DOJ, but after-the-fact compliance may be meaningless as well. It’d be quite typical for Trump/Bondi to fully “defend” and settle the case with taxpayer money already in Trump’s account before any challenges complete, followed by appeals, etc.
28 cfr 50.15
(10) If conflicts exist between the legal and factual positions of various employees in the same case which make it inappropriate for a single attorney to represent them all, the employees may be separated into as many compatible groups as is necessary to resolve the conflict problem and each group may be provided with separate representation. Circumstances may make it advisable that private representation be provided to all conflicting groups and that direct Justice Department representation be withheld so as not to prejudice particular defendants. In such situations, the procedures of § 50.16 will apply.
The oig not the commissioner would act on behalf of the IRS because the commissioner is a conflicted party.
What is that supposed to mean, use your words.
We’ll see what happens…