ooli3@sopuli.xyz to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 2 days agotranslated in americani.redd.itimagemessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up1952arrow-down110
arrow-up1942arrow-down1imagetranslated in americani.redd.itooli3@sopuli.xyz to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 2 days agomessage-square89fedilink
minus-squaredefinitemaybe@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 hours agoBut 144 is better than 100, for the exact same reason that 12 is better than 10? There’s a reason measured angles go to 360ths, then subdivided by 60 or even by 60 again. 100 is as terrible a base as 10, and you run into it all the time if you’re designing something in metric; you can’t divide by 3 evenly.
But 144 is better than 100, for the exact same reason that 12 is better than 10?
There’s a reason measured angles go to 360ths, then subdivided by 60 or even by 60 again.
100 is as terrible a base as 10, and you run into it all the time if you’re designing something in metric; you can’t divide by 3 evenly.