At this point, it’s economically irresponsible not to transition to renewables, even from a conservative, market-focused perspective. Fossil fuel power plants require ongoing fuel purchases to operate. Renewable energy sources like wind and solar do not.
Once installed, renewables generate electricity without the continuous cost of buying and burning fuel. That difference fundamentally changes the economics. When you factor in the long-term savings from not having to purchase a resource that must be consumed to produce power, the financial case for renewables becomes difficult to ignore.
Renewables also have the potential to change how we think about energy forever. We’d never have to have a conservation mindset concerning energy use. Can you imagine what could be possible if you didn’t have to worry about the cost or ammonunt of energy you need to perform a task?
I think that works in most of the world but the US has too many people who make money from fossil fuels. While we’re not self-sufficient, we’re a very large exporter so on average ……
But I have always wonder why nuclear folks can make an “abundant energy” argument but not renewables.
Absolutely god damned right. What we are fighting is a century and trillions of dollars sunk into behemoth infrastructure and a web of industries that is based on a dying model, and the people who own that infrastructure and industry will fight tooth and nail to keep the world hooked into them, they are very literally investing heavy money into propaganda and mass manipulation to keep it that way.
Humanity is being brainwashed on scale, and it’s working, but cracks are showing. Can’t fool all the people all the time, and the writing is on the wall when it comes to fossil fuel.
At this point, it’s economically irresponsible not to transition to renewables, even from a conservative, market-focused perspective. Fossil fuel power plants require ongoing fuel purchases to operate. Renewable energy sources like wind and solar do not.
Once installed, renewables generate electricity without the continuous cost of buying and burning fuel. That difference fundamentally changes the economics. When you factor in the long-term savings from not having to purchase a resource that must be consumed to produce power, the financial case for renewables becomes difficult to ignore.
Renewables also have the potential to change how we think about energy forever. We’d never have to have a conservation mindset concerning energy use. Can you imagine what could be possible if you didn’t have to worry about the cost or ammonunt of energy you need to perform a task?
I think that works in most of the world but the US has too many people who make money from fossil fuels. While we’re not self-sufficient, we’re a very large exporter so on average ……
But I have always wonder why nuclear folks can make an “abundant energy” argument but not renewables.
Absolutely god damned right. What we are fighting is a century and trillions of dollars sunk into behemoth infrastructure and a web of industries that is based on a dying model, and the people who own that infrastructure and industry will fight tooth and nail to keep the world hooked into them, they are very literally investing heavy money into propaganda and mass manipulation to keep it that way.
Humanity is being brainwashed on scale, and it’s working, but cracks are showing. Can’t fool all the people all the time, and the writing is on the wall when it comes to fossil fuel.