• YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    I said almost the same here a few weeks ago. Sisko got results, and wasn’t afraid to fight on occasion. I will love Picard cause he was the first captain I knew as a kid. But being a paragon will only get you so far. Sometimes you need to bend/break the rules & get your hands dirty if you want shit to get done!

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      And it wasn’t like with Picard where he made a decision and apparently felt good enough about that it was business as normal once made.

      Like In The Pale Moonlught when he brought the romulans into the fight.

      There were no good answers. No ethical ones. He’ll have to live with it, and he can.

      • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Good point! Maybe I should give tng another binge, cause I’m only remembering him as this stalwart of Starfleet doing everything by the viewscreen.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          In the pale moonlight is DS9, they needed the romulans to join against the dominion/cardassians so he did some unethical things that garak came up with to get them on side.

          Picard is a paragon of federation virtue, and he was never in a situation where all the options were just as bad. There always a clear way forward.

          (Though I do have to wonder what was said about data blasting the aqueduct.)