• HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 hours ago

    basically if you take a photo of the violation it will go to the department that issues citations and it will be evaluated to determine if one should be sent. Way more scrutiny than the automated camera ones.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      You mean they’ll check to see who the car belong to, and if they’re one of the people that is above the law.

    • chickenf622@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I would trust the output of an automated system (excluding AI) more than the output of a human, so the difference in scrutiny makes sense. Although I’m not sure how good the automated system is, so I can’t say definitively that’s the case.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I don’t think anything like traffic tickets or such should be 100% automated. I don’t mind an automated filtering mechanism but I think every citation should be written out and signed by someone with all the required trainings and such and they should have viewed and verified that in their opinion a violation occured.

        • chickenf622@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Oh for sure needs a human in the loop. I was just thinking of why this system would have more scrutiny by default.