In fairness. When you sign up to work for a startup you have an idea what that means. AI startups are well known to be even worse. AI startups cost a lot more, so they have to move even faster before they run out of money. They also usually pay very well. And if the one you are at happens to make it really big, you might retire in your 20s.
And… if you have worked at an AI startup for any length of time, every big company is looking to hire you. So you can easily leave anytime.
So what I am saying is that these people made a choice. And they continue to make that choice everyday.
Source: I have worked at startups (recently got aquired so stuck at a big company until my payoff vests). I intentionally ruled out the AI start ups, and thier equivalent before them, because I don’t care to make it big. I want to work with top people who can do thier own jobs and with less overhead. But I have kids and hobbies that I don’t want to give up. So I made my choice. These people can too.
The death-march work culture is the goal, not an unintended side effect of the way AI is being implemented by the oligarchs.
It’s time for one big union.
Reminds me of MMO addiction.
This doesnt stop until there are no more billionaires.
imagine wrecking your life working to advance a thing for which the ultimate end goal is to replace you entirely
I don’t have to imagine :(
imagine wrecking your life working to advance a thing for which the ultimate end goal is to replace you entirely
That isn’t new with AI. Non-AI Automation has been the goal (and achievement) of business for decades.
Automation is great , everything should be automated as much as possible.
IF everyone benefits from it in the form of higher wages/less working hours due to the higher productivity.
IF everyone benefits from it in the form of higher wages/less working hours due to the higher productivity.
I know this is a common philosophical statement, but I haven’t yet seen a great implementation of it in reality. I’m interested if your approach is viable.
Scenario:
Lets say we have a 25 year old worker named Jim. Jim was hired and his job for 1 year was to log into a system, look up specific values, and populate these values into fields in an Excel spreadsheet. At the beginning of the second year, a small Bash script (computer code) was written by an engineer and set to run on a repeating daily schedule that did all of the lookups and sheet population that was Jim’s entire job. The entirely of Jim’s job has been replaced by automation.
Result:
Jim no longer has any work to do for the organization. There aren’t any other open positions at the company for Jim (or if there are Jim is not even remotely qualified to do those other jobs).
- So how would you apply your philosophy to this situation?
- Do you believe the organization should continue to employ Jim even without any work for him?
- Should he be let go, but still paid? If so, how much, and for how long?
UBI is the obvious solution to this and study after srudy has proven its efficacy.
UBI is a fantasy all the money will go to the wealth hoarders at the top. People are already dying on the streets everyday, we hardly have any access to healthcare or working protections unless there’s a revolution it’s a fantasy. The meager safety net we have gets gutted every time we have a Republican in office and the democrats almost never reverse the damage. The Trump administration has stated it intends to get the United states population down at least 100 million. They posted it on the DHS website and miller has been talking about it. More than likely the cruel policies that expedite deaths from poverty will be rapidly expanded. I had to watch my own mom die in this cruel system where you can not access healthcare if you don’t have a house to liquidate and it’s disgusting beyond belief. I think more and more people are going to be ground up and die inside when they realize that these dark realities of the cruelty that our system is built on start expanding. The working class is running out of money for them to grift from us so we’re disposable now
I’m a proponent of UBI, but that has nothing to do with the “IF everyone benefits from it in the form of higher wages/less working hours due to the higher productivity” philosophy OP posted though.
With UBI, Jim would be getting basic income (like everyone else) irrespective if he ever had the job in the example or not, and irrespective if the automation occurred or not.
Automation, in the case of UBI, would mean that the productivity gain would translate into less hour worked, with a minimum guaranteed revenue every month/year.
The reality is that automation efficiency is going straight into capitalists pockets. And people having a bigger workload for the same amount of money as before.
Without a societal shift, automation is not for the benefits of the general populace.
Automation, in the case of UBI, would mean that the productivity gain would translate into less hour worked, with a minimum guaranteed revenue every month/year.
That is a typical answer I get to my question. It fully contains the philosophy that automation gains will somehow be funneled into state coffers or UBI initiatives but its completely missing in any substance about how that translates into reality.
The reality is that automation efficiency is going straight into capitalists pockets. And people having a bigger workload for the same amount of money as before.
I gave an example with Jim above. At the end, Jim is out of work, and the organization has gained money because they aren’t paying Jim, and their automation is doing the work now. Does your actual implementation of your philosophy attempt to tax or clawback some of what Jim was being paid? If so, how and against what metrics? Alternatively, do you propose that what pays the UBI is completely divorced from what the organization earns or pays?
“Learn to work like this now or you will be left behind.” The “experts” say.
I’m about to retire, and my post-retirement research interest is going to be how to disrupt and kill AI systems.
well there goes my chances of landing a job. I had one thing mention a flexible work schedule and I asked them about it like can I make my own hours or shifts or decide how many hours to work or what. Did not hear back. Don’t know if they don’t like my questions or if they would have blown me off either way.
Flexible work schedule == working after hours, and on weekends. Always.
if it does they did not reply to explain that. I see flexible work sechedule and I assume they are listing a perk.
You can arrive 15 mins later than usual on every other friday. And you are expected to stay after your normal work hours for no additional pay.
That’s flexibility for you.
seriously people who do this need to stop. Do your 8 and your 40 but no more. I mean if you are being paid a premium which would be at least 200k in the us. Then fine do the bit extra but honestly most jobs asking for that are not giving enough. You should as a single income have zero worries about paying bills and have a good amount of disposable income to make it easier to enjoy the time you do have in that situation.
Interviewed at a place. Asked how many hours for a normal work week in engineering. They casually say 45-50. Mentally shut that door so damn fast.
Honestly I assume 50 if it pays well. Im increasingly seeing where I think they want to float on the idea the experience will lead to a better job with the good pay but want all that. And they are looking for experience that someone would have had to be in the field at least 10 years to get so the person should not need the exp to get better pay. If the corps want to make the recruitment process a sodomy contest then imma out.
Remember kids, this is why you never EVER listen to techbros about how to structure society.
.XKCD 2030
I thought the point was to have AI do everything… if you’re requiring 12 hour days, doesn’t that just mean the AI is failing?
Turns out that the folks who came up with “Move Fast. Break Things.” as a business stategy aren’t very good at business stategizing.
Capitalism is a cancerous disease which will result in our self-annihilation if it isn’t stopped.
996 is the most inhuman idea. What is the point?
Neo-feudalism. To have us so exhausted and immiserated that we won’t organize and rise up against them.
To prop up the system that is needed to prop up the system.
Why would any human being consent to this being their life?
I don’t recall when they have ever asked for our consent.
You have already answered yourself
MAGA is going to replace as many jobs as they can with AI and Robotics. Then MAGA will deal with the 50% unemployment rate by imprisoning people without jobs, are homeless, have too much debt, aren’t otherwise employable, will go to work camps, where they will be leased out as slaves to corporations, causing another wave of job losses, and a 75% unemployment rate. And it’s all going to happen much faster than anyone believes.
Better start to figure out your own business now, so it can be up and running when 90% of traditional employment is replaced by AI, Robotics, and Slaves.
