Apple employees outnumbered customers at Vision Pro launch in San Francisco’s Union Square::Apple’s new Vision Pro headset drew a sparse but eager crowd to San Francisco’s Union Square on Friday, for pickups and demos.

  • Troy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    Prediction: this will be considered Apple’s biggest product flop in decades, and may even unseat the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerBook_5300 for worst in company history. The whole product line will be scrapped before 2027.

    Fortunately they have the cash to burn on projects like this to see what takes.

    I’ll post this in [email protected] so someone can call me on it one day ;)

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ll take that bet. I’ve had a Vive for years, Apple’s effort addresses all of the issues I have with that headset. I’m excited to see what devs are going to come up with, there’s going to be some amazing apps coming out.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        I worry that it’s a bit chicken and egg. I’ve a psvr and psvr2, for reference. Without millions of users, the market for a range of quality apps is poor. Then, of those quality apps, only a few will be truly great, even less revolutionary enough to sell a $3500 headset for one.

        • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          This is a big step up from existing VR headsets, it can do things they can’t, so I’m excited to see what devs can do.

          • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Me too, but that assumes devs that have the time and access to do so. If it’s not mass market, they may not. In a way, hopefully it means that all vr has to use the same apis/design language eventually rather than a a new set of competing systems. Obviously, with seeing how the phone market went, none of the big companies will allow that to happen if they can avoid it.

      • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        Why do you think there will be amazing apps? Low volume means expensive apps that don’t make a lot of money for the devs compared to, say, the much larger VR market.

          • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            That already existed on psvr 4 years ago and I think take up was minimal. Again, it could be something that apple can popularise, now the technology is better, but it won’t be ground breaking.

            • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Psvr has the issue of having to buy a console and the headset. Though they may be cheaper compared to vision pro they have the gaming stigma around it while this has the luxury brand on it.
              How many billionaires will buy a vision pro vs how many would buy the psX + psvr?

              This is a device suitable for the masses.

              • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                Yes, but many millions of the kind of people that would be interested already have a ps5. For those that don’t, it’s still cheaper to buy both twice over.

                It’s designed for vr, not at, so the video pass through is sufficient rather than great. It’s still a huge step up and hopefully, so is the apple headset.

                • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  The psvr2 is geniunly interesting. Alone for the adaptive resolution scaling.
                  Too bad it only works on PS for now

            • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              The groundbreaking part is to take that tech, refine it, and sell a metric fuckton of hardware. Groundbreaking is seeing all these disparate, unconnected technologies come together into something new.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        And that’s the big dead on arrival red flag. There’s already some ecosystem for VR/AR, specially in games. But Apple is not compatible with any of that. If people could buy a VisionPro and instantly start installing and using the software they already own and have been using for a few years but with better hardware and a better experience, the story would be different and this would be a runaway success. But this is one of the cases where the walled garden and overall hostility towards developers from Apple will bite them in the ass. A few massive players have straight up refused to port their software for the Vision Pro, and hardware platforms live or die on their supported software. This is one where Apple can’t carry the whole burden of development of apps since they are already bogged down with keeping up and coming up with an entirely new OS and an entirely new UX. If they don’t open the garden and let help in, the Vision Pro will forever be a curious toy, not the productivity machine they want it to be.

        • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          If they don’t open the garden and let help in

          What does that look like to you? I’m not sure what it is you want Apple to do.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I don’t give a fuck about what Apple does. Their actions and decisions are inconsequential to me personally.

            But, entertaining the questions, they could’ve reach out to the developers of the most popular VR apps and games to entice them to port as soon as possible. The only similar thing I’ve heard was a small indie that made like a YouTube frontend, or something (IDK). And that was not on a Dev kit but on a emulator. Which has gigantic limitations. They could also allow devs broader access to the system, like allowing sideloading, kernel level modules, open source some part of the OS to allow people to understand how it works, tinker with and innovate over the possibilities that the hardware brings.

            All those are things that Apple will never do though. And as a result, their hardware platform won’t be the bed of innovation they want it to be. Right now the vision pro has no killer app or must have feature. You can’t build the future by forbidding everyone from building unless they pay you out of the nose just to even see the building site.

    • Dave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I heartily disagree. This is a 1.0 product, and though it’s deeply flawed in so many ways, it also nailed interactions that other companies have struggled with. They’re going to iterate and pivot on this platform for the next few years (and sell cheaper models) and they will find the sweet spot. This platform is here to stay.

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        This is a 1.0 product, and though it’s deeply flawed in so many ways

        So they release incomplete product.

        Other comnies: we are making game for vr and will release it any second now. Aaaany second now. Done. By the way, we just releasing state-of-art vr set Valve Index with base stations and controllers that greatly improves over other vr headsets that costs like average headset.

        • Dave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Define “complete”.

          A 1.0 product is by definition the worst product the company will make of that type. That’s no different from any other product by any other company.

          There is no complete product. There are only products you can buy, and those you can’t.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        How will they fix it? They need future tech. What Apple did right now is combine all the best current tech. It’s gonna be a few years until our tech is actually good enough for these headsets to be seamless.

        • Dave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          You’re conflating the perfect with the good. The question is not whether Vision Pro is perfect, it’s whether it’s good enough for today. I happen to think that it is for the goals the company has set (well under 1M units sold). But it will of course improve rapidly every year.

          This is not new. This is every new product Apple has introduced.

        • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          This also isn’t an iPod. The audience for something like this especially at that price is still quite limited. To me it’s pretty obvious that this is a peek into the future. Apple will just be one of the many companies doing glasses like this but this will be big.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I would bet that R&D for something like this must be around several billion dollars, so this is not even breaking even when you add in marketing and production costs.

            • ShustOne@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Right but this is preorder. How often does a preorder break even for Apple? How does this income compare to the size of normal preorders?

            • uis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              All R&D was already done before them. So they already break even.

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      The 5300 was a flop because it had multiple failure/recall issues. I doubt Vision will have these sorts of problems.

      Not saying it won’t flop, but that the product comparison doesn’t feel correct.