• drkt@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I have mobility issues and car infrastructure does nothing for me and in many cases makes my life harder.

      Nobody said you couldn’t build paths between places.

      Fuck you.

    • Carl@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      Fun fact: massive parking lots also cause problems for those with mobility issues. So do really wide roads. Dense and therefore walkable city infrastructure is also the most disability-friendly city infrastructure, full stop.

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        God, I don’t want to imagine how awful it must be for a person with mobility problems to cross those wide ass roads they have in the US…

    • erin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      What. Effective public transport and less car centric infrastructure is far and away better for those with mobility issues. Walkable areas does not mean the abolishment of cars, it means more effective use of space and transport. Try visiting Austria or the Netherlands. Getting around is far, FAR easier than any city in the US. I have mobility issues, and require a cane to get around if I’m standing for significant periods, and yet the easiest time I had getting around was the time I spent in Vienna after living in different parts of the US for my whole life.

        • erin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Bus. Tram. Subway. Train. And yes, I do drive if necessary. Walkable does not mean walking is mandatory, and a huge part of the push for a decrease in car only infrastructure is the increase in public transportation. The idea isn’t to remove the ability for cars to exist, but to make other forms of transportation accessible and possible, and make reliance on cars a thing of the past. I don’t know why you’ve got it so wrapped up in your head that cars are going to vanish and we will only be walking, as if there aren’t dozens of other forms of transportation accessible for those of us with disabilities. The time I’ve spent living in places with good public transportation is the most independence and self determination I’ve experienced. I’m not lying, you’re just disingenuous, stupid, or misinformed.

            • erin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              I’m not hateful. The bus stop is never more than a short walk away. If you need a car to go 100 feet, then you shouldn’t be living alone. Do you think every disabled person is stupid? I’m not going to choose an apartment up 3 flights of stairs on the other end of the block from the bus stop. I’m going to use the ADA apartment on the ground floor that is a shorter walk to the bus stop than half the parking lot. If I need to get somewhere that I can’t access with public transportation without excessive walking, I’ll drive or get my fiancee to drive me. I’m sorry you think I’m hateful for sharing my own lived experience. That’s on you for lack of comprehension, not me.

              Edit: And again, I USE CARS. I will continue to use cars when necessary. An increase in walkable cities and good public transportation means the roads will be more free for those that need them! It’s just an all around win, even if you absolutely need a car for any form of transport for some odd reason (even those that require a wheelchair use public transport over cars in most cities that have good transportation, because the infrastructure is built with us in mind).

                • erin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  You. Don’t. Have. To. Use your car! It’s not being taken away! You will have EASIER access to the roads with less people on them. I’m genuinely dumbfounded by your inability to understand this, or your apparent belief that disabled people either don’t live in or don’t use public transportation in places that have great transport. Seriously. You’re fighting ghosts here with how off the mark you are.

                  • DrWorm@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    I’m convinced he’s unable to actually read anything we’re saying. He’s projecting that we are the ones being hateful. But he’s blinded by his own hate. It’s really sad to see. No one is taking his car away. I don’t understand how providing multiple forms of mobility is a bad thing. But he believes that car is the only one.

                    You can’t reach a person that’s unwilling to read and comprehend what is being said. He’s being contrarian to be contrarian. I hope he gets help, but seeing how he contracts himself, he’s delusional enough that he thinks he’s justified in being an ass. You’ll be unable to have any productive conversation with this individual. But it is truly a sight to behold.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why wouldn’t it make more sense to provide mobility assistance like motorized chairs for the 1% of users who need such to get them to and from transit options including parking even if its not house side.