return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 10 个月前Shots fired into insurance CEO’s Oregon homewww.oregonlive.comexternal-linkmessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1575arrow-down14cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1571arrow-down1external-linkShots fired into insurance CEO’s Oregon homewww.oregonlive.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 10 个月前message-square67fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 个月前They certainly do need to foot the bill for unsafe workplaces, but that does not need to be tied directly to injuries. They should be paying for the unsafe workplace even if no one is injured, and even more if someone is injured.
minus-squarespooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-210 个月前 They should be paying for the unsafe workplace even if no one is injured, and even more if someone is injured. You just described the purpose of both OSHA and workman’s comp.
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-210 个月前Yes, I know. I am saying they should be one thing instead of two things.
They certainly do need to foot the bill for unsafe workplaces, but that does not need to be tied directly to injuries. They should be paying for the unsafe workplace even if no one is injured, and even more if someone is injured.
You just described the purpose of both OSHA and workman’s comp.
Yes, I know. I am saying they should be one thing instead of two things.