This is why we don’t depend on American providers

You mean actual fascists and not just people you disagree with… right? Right???

Why do you celebrate it in the afternoon?

An example proposition that is similar to this comic

I thought you peel in the direction of the arrow

I think it’s the speech bubbles

I’m not talking about a debate over “should homosexuality/same-sex-marriage be illegal/banned”, just morality in general. It’s kind of hard to believe in and justify objective morality without some form of religion. From what I can tell, it’s the Humanists who understand this

Never heard that one, that’s quite mental. One thing I heard from a young earth creationist was that “global warming isn’t accurate because it’s using an assumption that the earth is 6-10,000 years old”… Although in that case, wouldn’t it be much more urgent?

Never heard of anyone doing that ngl. Except possibly secularists with arguments about certain morality, eg, “without using the Bible, explain how homosexuality is immoral” although I think I’ve only come across that one twice

I don’t get it

That’s not his actual surname. Mountbatten-Windsor is a surname given to descendants of royals who aren’t working members (or ex royals in Andrew’s case). While Charles still doesn’t have a surname, generally if you faced a situation where you had a database which absolutely must take a surname, he’d likely simply put down “Windsor” as the Mountbatten thing was a compromise made between the late Queen Elizabeth II and the family of the late Prince Philip.

It kind of applies to working royals as well.

However even then, I believe that would probably only be used by Princess Anne. As the children of the Prince and Princess of Wales will probably use the word “Wales” in place of a surname, and previously would have likely used “Cambridge” in terms of school records. I don’t know how this works out for the rest of the family as Princess Beatrice and Eugenie’s father (formerly York) lost his title and the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh’s children aren’t working royals/prince/princess despite the fact they are normally perfectly entitled to the title, as they are a grandchild of the monarch. (Although with Harry and Andrew gone, some are speculating that Lady Louise Mountbatten-Windsor might step up).

Queen Elizabeth II still has some living cousins such as HRH The Duke of Kent and HRH The Duke of Gloucester. They aren’t really well known but are still carrying out royal duties quite diligently (well, that would also depend on your viewpoint on royal duties, etc)

There is a difference

Depends what value. It is good to be contributing to society. But you can still be contributing and not working 996

Dunno if you’re at the absolute bottom. A lot of careers would appreciate the professional/business experience anyway, especially interchangable skills.

That’s an interesting thing, in many countries such as the UK, it is perfectly legal to just not have a surname. Probably the best example is our own King, Charles.

Judas

Interesting 🤔

Is this about China or the UK? I think there are some things you can say in China but not in the UK, provided it doesn’t regard the authorities

Soon it’ll be a year without him…

This is why the Chinese don’t take us seriously when we boast about our “freedom of speech” LOL