I would treat it like a baby. From what I gather, that wouldn’t end-well for me, but the scarier part is that last bit is going to change, and least in-so-far as whether it is capable of intending to manipulate me towards an early grave, and its being “educated” by fools who buy the hype in the mean-time.
Smarter, saner people than I or the hype-machine, I hope you’re not letting the chance to even attemp to handle this correctly pass you by. For all our sakes.
The last three panels, or all four, being the same girl is also a plot-twist contender. Makeup and clothes, how do they work?
Ouch, that poor bastard.
I’ll take “Problems that would be resolved by increasing pay, benefits and working conditions until turnover isn’t on-par with fast-food, or even worse”, Alex.
Talk about a nothing burger. Is there a petition? A bill to pester a representative about? Its just another “news” day ending in y
I’m too stupid to be afraid to ask today, apparently. “Please” enlighten me.
Reasons I left San Diego. I should have realized the girls my age had stopped boasting about their middle-aged boyfriends sometime during/before Freshmen year(I mostly believed/hoped they made shit up and I still avoid thinking about it), but all I knew was that I had my own bullshit and believed my main contribution to any relationship would be “I can make it worse”.
It also bugged me that dudes my age were more concerned with who could be/“must be” lying about what than how horrible the truth must be for at least one. That one stuck with me. Lie to me about trauma; If a less traumatic or “non-traumatic” truth comes-out, I’mma be stuck on relief, first and formost, and then … feeling pressured to lie like-so sounds like its own trauma/baggage.
Now you’ve got me sad OP didn’t specify on-line or in-person, because I can’t dispute your take on in-person, I just don’t like it.
Well shit, and doesn’t say what community its removed from either, but honestly, its the titles that are most worthwhile. The removed-comments section does at least specify the user.
I imagine it varies by-instance, but that’s all I’ve got, sorry.
EDIT: This is what it looks like for me…
So, on posts, next to the up-vote arrow, there’s a rainbow-colored pentagon that will take you to that post on its original instance.
I guess for deleted posts you would instead need to go to the community/instance where what you are trying to find was, but the modlog there would definitely be the place to check, IF my original comment is correct, which I haven’t seen confirmed or disproven yet. I have no idea if the modlog federates per-se, beyond the minimum pointers/references necessary for mod-actions to propogate.
Pretty sure that’s in there, even if not all-together in an easy-to-see as-it-originally-was form. Transparency was a big part of the Lemmy schtick/sell during the reddit exodus.
Modlog
Bottom of every page.
Nah. Sell residents a year-round pass at a steep discount, but half-measures are more easilly defeated.
The people who can make things happen at all or stop them want to see progress before they get bored. They’ll fund campaigns and such if there’s nothing to show for the fees, or you’ll hear nothing more about the backlash than an enthusiastic community member getting arrested at an open meeting.
There are of course always people getting arrested like so, but when you don’t want your side to look crazy, you make sure its “the protesters who obviously did nothing wrong” getting arrested that makes the news, or not-at-all.
You think the boundaries weren’t spelled out? I mean, we all know “international law” is a joke 1st world countries ignore versus their own actions and the rest of the world, but versus eachother? “Don’t fuck with us and we won’t fuck with you” is stupidly over-defined.
The same for the financial enmeshment that sees this threat well-inside the realm of potential reality. Europe never promised not to sell these debts. The fact the US can’t complain about it if they do is part of what makes it a good threat. Are you not familiar with “soft power”, like, at all?
You might have begun to be onto something if this was the only threat in Europes hand, but let’s be real for a moment: the deck is stacked so badly in Europe’s favor towards a half-dozen or so Royal Flushes that come with a free(if unwanted) blow-job, and dozens of other relatively-painless-to-Europe-but-enough-to-Fuck-up-a-US-election-cycle-or-three options, its absurd, so saying “maybe they could, but should they?” is insincere and enabling at best.
Pretend this is a Zoo; The signs say such things as “Please Don’t Feed Pedo-Hitler”, and “Break Glass For Free Dart-Gun in Case of Escaped Pedo-Hitler” … you’re the person hemming and hawing about someone else maybe breaking the glass while escaped Pedo-Hitler stalks a pre-school class. Could you at least get out of the way of the other adults, or are you cool with it being assumed you are happy to see Pedo-Hitler on the wrong side of the barriers?
The people living there in 20 years STILL won’t control their own lands, you mean. If I’m wrong, I might then consider your implication that those people won’t count as Europeans, but to that I would only say “GOOD FOR THEM THEN!”
… now do one where the only building on-fire is a bank.
Trump didn’t specify how we would remove Maduro in the same way its pointless for Europe to specify exactly how they could or would retaliate. Its more than enough for there to be multiple options to make them all valid when it comes time to say “we warned you”.
Please don’t confuse my enthusiasm for one option that’s been shown to be possible and devestating, for me saying this is the only option Europe should consider. On the contrary, I’m just wishing they would pick an option that matters and run with it already. All they’ve done is show their belly like a submissive dog.
They don’t even appear to care about plausible deniability any more. Arresting Gaza protestors is just such a good, strong-arm look for going against Trump. Fear of Europe must be why so many churches in my area are flying Israeli flags at the moment.
As for how you contradicted yourself, you said “if the threat isn’t listened to then they act on it”, then went on to claim a threat that has to be followed-through on is worthless. On the contrary, a threat that has been known all-along is rendered moot when you spell it out long after the time for it is past.
Its the threat you have to verbalize that’s worthless. Holding a knife to someone’s throat to threaten another person is not the act of someone with any control over their present situation, and its a threat made-up on the spot that’s easilly invalidated in so, so many ways. That scenario is not applicable to Europe versus the US at all.
No one is proposing they rattle their saber. The scale of the threat has long been too great to bother speaking aloud, and putting it into words instead of action would just be laugable.
Again, the “listened to” or no phase is past the horizon, around the curve and honestly several hills and valleys back in the rear-view mirror. A threat that isn’t followed-through on or is spoken only after you’ll obviously never act isn’t even a threat any more; Its a mark of submission.
Nice job contradicting yourself in that second paragraph though. Let me ask you this: Did Trump bother saying we were going to, could, or “should” abduct Maduro in advance?
As meta almost-showed, the reason “why” is to keep those platforms from interacting with federated-services on their own terms - they can’t control the interaction if no one uses their implimentation.
Leave it to them, and its embrace-extend-extinguish all the way down. Reddit and the rest have used AI-training as an excuse to lock-down and claim owner-ship of user-generated content. Letting them keep users from using our own content how we please would be a mistake.