Congress and Mexico not helping to kill or deport enough brown people from Central and South America? Kill them while they’re traversing Guatemala, or fishing peacefully in international waters!
I see you, fucking Nazi terrorists.
Shame on Guatemala. You don’t even share a border with Orange man!
Up-skirt photos are the one area where this gets me caught-up; Either a hypocrite or a shitty person. For the sake of consistency, I tend towards shittiness - the only real reason there’s anything like an expectation of privacy in public is so shitty (powerful)people can get-away with shitty things, when really, being in-public is being on-display.
Then there’s my stance on getting “caught” having sex on a park bench in a secluded forest by way of a trail-cam. I’m far from convinced that video evidence should count as evidence of an otherwise truly private, victemless, “crime” that otherwise wouldn’t be. We should only be jailing public officials caught-out in conflicts of interest/corruption like-so, and almost never the camera-man.
Instead, its the opposite. We are surprisingly far into all of this deep-fake and leaked-video shit for the average person to have any qualms about saying “whether that video is real or not is none of your business”, as if significant resources will be spent validating all but the highest-profile of images, but I get there are people who are generally embarassed and not just wrapped-up in their personal “sin” of having been portrayed or caught in a compromising position.
None of it upsets me so much as former strippers or adult film stars losing their jobs over shit that’s years-behind them, while genuine pedos escape notice for decades. I’ll say it again: society and the law are laser-focused on the wrong shit, and from the wrong-end of the turd at that.
Just a thought: politicians should not be allowed to use such apps. This right-to-privacy shit has gone too far, in the wrong direction, protecting ONLY the wrong people.
Just a thought: politicians should not be allowed to use such apps. This right-to-privacy shit has gone too far, in the wrong direction, protecting ONLY the wrong people.
“Encountered”? I was raised on that shit. I was bewildered the first time I encoundered a printed graphic sleeve, and learned that some people spent shelf space on tapes with only one movie each on them…
I mean, given that its based on specific teachers, the opt-out or in is going to have to be allowing the child to stay with the teacher the school assigned the child to, or request a transfer … unless magically trusting the researchers to scrub students faces. The biggest problem I see is the school acting like that last option is something that parents should even seriously consider.
You don’t have to be in the wreck to end-up “involved with” the wreck. Even if you’re not decent enough to stick-around to assist with the fall-out or give a witness-statement, there’s always the physical and time barrier of the wreck itself and the ensuing wait for emergency services, police, or even just a tow-truck.
Crazy to game on anything you trust with important data in general. Same for internet browsing-in-general though. Good Luck.
This is pretty much me. More or less with consoles as-well.
I mean, including Russia and China, its not so much “Western” as Northern, although the southern boundary varies. Then there’s the Nordic countries and Canada, but still, a continuous belt of imperialist states stradling the Northern hemisphere like a crown of semantic fuckery hiding behind “the international rule of law” and militaries with global reach.
… so they’ve started broadcasting reasons to doubt there have been any real attempts? I mean, reasons on the order of “no one asked and they should never tell”. I can smell one of his “genius ideas” they could not convince him not to act on from here.
It’s “parents” stole everyone’s work. The agency of AI-itself is still very much in-question.
The conversation in the comments was inspired by the comic. Y’all reached deep to confuse yourselves on that one, and ignore what’s right in front of you.
My first comment ended on the note that if you got your way, we would likely never interact again, and that that was fine by me. You didn’t have to treat this thread like your last chance to save my soul or sell me the latest from Amway global, but here we are.
I’m not here to apologize that some rosy cheeks and a linen-wrapped body that’s had its organs ripped-out doesn’t do it for either of us. Maybe move on with your day rather than literally chasing things to annoy and then claim you were the one being annoyed-by.
Attempted, sure, but it very much requires specific audiences to land. Did you think the word “delivers” was in there to look pretty?
Inspiring conversation and thought is far from “nothing else”. I thought I had implied this one delivers fuck-all in the way of “sexualization” unless one is desperate or aversive, but I guess I’ll make that statement explicit; It’s not sexy unless that’s what one is desperate to see or avoid.
I chuckled at this one for many reasons, not least of which because she would be dry, brittle, smelly, taste awful, voice probably horrifying, as well as delusional, dumb, or just inconsiderate to boot.
Whatever the case, not even a conversation first? On all but my worst days, I had more game than that, and could draw a mummy that doesn’t look like a water-filled baloon too, but sure, all that’s possibly going on with this one is innuendo.
I checked myself on the dude.
I thought the joke was that she forgot what Mummies do and made up something on the spot that just happens to suit her and her victim, this time.
EDIT: we don’t get the victim’s reaction. Not every dude’s a monster-fucker wannabe.
I’m happy with days when reality lets me pretend I’m gonna get to start, let alone complete, the thing. Perfection? What’s that?