• 1 Post
  • 277 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 7th, 2023

help-circle



  • I’ve been arguing for many years that being a billionaire is incompatible with being a decent human.

    We live in an economy of finite means, and being willing to put an absolutely insane portion of that finite resource into a bank account is exactly tantamount to ensuring poverty exists elsewhere. Anyone willing to horde such an insane amount of money is simply evil.

    I think part of why the public doesn’t get more upset about this though is that most people don’t understand how big a billion is. It is a number so large that our feeble little brains really struggle to grasp it, and we in common discourse talk about millionaires and billionaires like it’s just the next logical step.

    The difference between a million and a billion is about a billion.





  • Dude, we’ve all been skipping the middle man for literally years. We aren’t stopping skipping the middle man now. We have constant legal challenges and protests and all the other shit we’ve always been doing. Shit that hasn’t worked.

    We’ve already seen the base shift on this issue, failing to focus on in obvious addition to the shit we have already been doing and will obviously continue to do would be idiotic.




  • I didn’t dodge your question, I answered it directly in saying that convicting on accusations alone is a dark path.

    There is no number of accusations made that should be considered “proof” of anything.

    But, every accusation should be taken seriously and investigated objectively.

    (Btw, the salient part of that in relation to this conversation is “proven” not “reasonable doubt”)


  • Nate Cox@programming.devtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldThere's so many...
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    I’m not sure if you’re trying to argue with me or not from the general tone there?

    Regardless, as much as it sucks: innocent until proven guilty means proven guilty. Sentencing on accusations alone seems like a really dark path to walk, even when many people are accusing.

    That said, the effort put into finding evidence should certainly increase with the number of accusations made, and it’s well established that circumstantial evidence is enough to convict in many cases. Many accusations should mean many data points to validate against looking for credible evidence right?