It looks like its goal is to make everything less comfortable, not more.
It looks like its goal is to make everything less comfortable, not more.
24546982
What a great ad.
Schadenfreude intensifies.
No more than any other social network and more likely to be less so. This just seems to be a justification for future government action against the app/company.
My IQ continually dropped while reading this summary and anyone that knows me would tell you that I can’t afford that.
This is America
I think that’s a very apt summary of the case. It’s our super-lotto.
Everyone knows(like even my elderly mom) that Google, FB, etc follow you everywhere and that they use that data. I would have no doubt those sites knew she was disabled long before she visited the DMV site. It looks like she just found a way to monetize it.
The article seems a little light on any single fact but does anyone know if there’s any actual data that shows personal disability information being recorded/collected? Is the tracking code being served both on the public side and in the logged in portion of the portal? Absolutely no meaningful information was provided.
I know we can sue a sandwich, is this one of these lawsuits? “I found Google tracking code on the DMV site so it’s time to earn my retirement” sort of thing?
Sorry for not being clear, I wasn’t aware family sharing was even a thing. In my case, everyone is using my credentials to log into and use the games under my account. All the same property so same IP.
Pretty sure I’m good. Account email is a forwarder to a family domain and they have access to everything relating to the account. For all intents and purposes, it’s just me logging in from the grave.
My family plays the games under my account now. I imagine not much will change when I’m dead.
I know and consider those to be squarely on the fringe.
I don’t think major manufacturers ever will make them. We’ll continue to get one-off kickstarter-esque fringe phones that’ll keep the most devout Luddite happy and the rest of us will buy what we are offered whether we want a dumb phone or not.
No, I reordered the items, then returned without requesting refund, as some helpful commenter suggested here while you were writing your epic diatribe.
Thanks very much, that’s what we ended up doing. We just reordered the canceled items and then returned them with the “no refund needed” option chosen.
lol, calm down there, captain commenter. You’re going to blow a gasket.
I don’t have a business account with them but have had a Prime subscription since Prime became a thing and have to say that something has changed in regards to the support as of late and not for the better.
Last week, we had 6 orders scheduled to arrive to our house and we got notifications for all that they had been delivered to the office and handed to reception, which we don’t have, just a porch and a door. My wife contacted support to tell them and they said they would refund all of the orders without even looking to see where they got delivered to. The support person gave a few different totals, none of which were correct and we ended up having to go through our orders to add up the refund total since he couldn’t do it correctly. After all of that a refund was issued… and then the packages were delivered about 30 minutes later.
We have been trying for days now to let them know that the packages were delivered so we could be billed correctly but so far, every person we’ve talked to has said they’re allowed to refund but not allowed to charge us and that it had to be passed to someone above them.
I don’t have a lot of faith that they’ll figure it out and worry that some day, they’ll just cancel our account because they detected some type of fraud.
I absolutely love the token spoofing and hope more developers pursue that solution. The more unpaid API access, the better.
The senators were not the ones that exposed anything.