

It’s been enlightening to see how many people lash out at you personally, using the sleights they hope you’d consider most offensive, in response to your opinions on a technology.


It’s been enlightening to see how many people lash out at you personally, using the sleights they hope you’d consider most offensive, in response to your opinions on a technology.


A lot of people trust him, for some reason.


We appear to agree that AI simply increases the amount of energy usage rather than supplanting it, and that energy-intensive AI data centers are the norm for AI usage (such as the use OP is talking specifically about).


I didn’t realize people shut off their computers after having AI do something they might not have otherwise done anyway. Brains, yes. Computers, no.


yes that is what’s known as a: MOB.
mobs are inherently fascist.
That’s a… Wikipedia article for “crowd”. Not sure gathering at sports events is inherently fascist according to anybody.


I’ve heard some variety of “programmers like writing code more than reading it”
I can only imagine what it’s like to remove the former and pile on heaps more of the latter
I don’t presume Anthropic is designing anything to be ethical. First, the chatbot is unpredictable by design. Randomness is built in. Second, if they didn’t intend for bad things to happen, why didn’t an employee babysit it?
As the article said you can replace rogue agents with unpredictable computer programs if you really want, I don’t see the necessity.
Speaking of goalpost shifts: “Rogue agent” is the clickbait title across multiple articles. Remember you said nobody was misrepresenting the AIs. The still-inaccurate clarification (the unsupervised chatbot functioned exactly as it was designed to function, and the script running it allowed it to execute exactly the commands Anthropic wanted) doesn’t help the article the clarification is from. It certainly doesn’t absolve every other author.
the first article doesn’t say anything not factual
The title alone is not factual. AI did not go rogue. It behaved exactly as designed.


deleted by creator


Have you considered an alternative to the browser as a PDF reader?
https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.gitlab.mudlej.MjPdfReader/
I like this one, it’s plenty quick, and it doesn’t sit atop a whole web browser. (For desktops, I use SumatraPDF which is similarly snappy.)


Don’t take my word for it, but perhaps a Mastodon post shared to Lemmy. But you’d have to hunt down one that accepted copious amounts of text, and that’s saying Lemmy clients would format the result decently.
Nobody is claiming any of the things this article is fighting against
Three counterexamples:
I realize we are in a bit of a bubble here, but this is the framing in the wider world
there were unintended negative consequences
Well…


“Aggressive” is how I understand the language of someone who attacks “natural intelligence” and promises to “very loudly ignore” the people he deems "social warrior"s and “religious” for not agreeing with his opinions, telling anyone who disagrees with him to “look in the mirror”.


People trusted Linux to be better than Microsoft Windows, and saw the effect of a company with tons of money and first-class AI access exponentially worsening their product.
It has been disappointing to see people like Linus Torvalds turn aggressive against people who do not agree with his ideology, and I find it distasteful for you to use reductive attacks against strawmen as well.


Considering Graphene’s entire reputation is staked on extremely precise definitions of security, this is a little concerning.
They’re the “best” (read: most secure) mobile operating system. If the best degrades, I don’t foresee some Graphene alternative stepping up very quickly (see also: cross-platform alternatives to Google-made Chromium and Google-funded Gecko)


“Fascism in your technology is inevitable”
Really, we should have heeded his warnings.