• AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The cost of all stuffed animals at a thrift shop.

    Then I could easily work on increasing the amount of rescues I will have. It’s currently 1.5 rescue to 4 others ( purchased at a store, gift shop, gift, etcetera ).

    My goal to someday have more rescues than store bought would be a little easier.

    Oh yeah, and kids would have an easier time accessing them because $1 stuffed animals are a lot easier to convince a parent to buy than a $5.99 stuffed animal. But I don’t like kids, so they were an afterthought!

  • Birch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Currently it costs direct air capture startup “Climeworks” about 1200 usd to remove one metric ton of CO2 from the atmosphere, the average human directly emits about 0.8 kg of CO2 a day (just through breathing).

    Thus, breathing costs 1 USD a day to offset using “Direct Air Capture”.

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It said price, not cost. Now no one will solve climate change because the price is beneath cost.

  • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Henceforth, $1 shall cost $1. Inflation solved.

    Does this one need a sarcasm tag? I don’t like using em but this joke is going to start zero fun conversations

    • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sarcasm acknowledged. If it were possible, what do you think the world would look like if inflation were 0% for a few decades? I hope this is a fun conversation. If not, I’ll settle for another joke, amusing anecdote or icy silence with a judgmental stare.

      • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        if inflation were 0% for a few decades

        “You obviously know nothing of how the real world works.”

        Was going to type a whole bullshit essay with random made up stats and facts to make your idle question look malicious and uninformed, but I just cant be arsed. Can we just pretend I was a cunt for mild chuckles?

        • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I got the same macroeconomics education as a lot of people. I get why 2% inflation is a common target. I do, however, like thought experiments using extreme values.

          I wouldn’t say it’s a particularly idle question by social media standards. Admittedly, that’s a pretty low bar. Perhaps I am uniformed. I’m definitely not being malicious.

          Can we just pretend I was a cunt for mild chuckles?

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Time preferences would be lengthened due to lower interest rates. People would save instead of taking on more debt. It would be harder to get a loan, but your real interest rate would be lower.

        Instead of deliberately encouraging consumption, everyone would buy less stuff. This would be terrible for “the economy” (rich people) but great for people who live in the environment.

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’d enjoy the topic at a less busy time of life. I’m being kept tired, distracted, and poor lately as a systematic form of oppressive totalitarian rule - and that’s just from my kid!

        • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          Fair enough. Thanks for taking the time to respond.

          I’m being kept tired, distracted, and poor lately as a systematic form of oppressive totalitarian rule - and that’s just from my kid!

          Hiyo! I really got a kick out of that.

          You stay brave, Little Hitachi Wand.

          Edit: Forgit tu spel gud

      • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        The world economies slow down probably.

        At negative inflation there is no incentive to spend your money because is becomes increasingly valuable the longer you hold it. With high inflation, there’s incentive to spend because the longer you keep your money in the mattress the less it’s worth to you.

        At zero it just is, but that’s less than the usual goal of a couple percent of inflation year over year.

        Or maybe I’m full of shit idk.

      • Eq0@literature.cafe
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        The assumed reason for inflation, as I understand it, is that on one hand things devalue over time and on the other we build our system around infinite growth and rewarding innovation (many asterisks here…)

        During the Middle Ages, neither statements were considered true, the world was considered stagnant and there was virtually no inflation. That was before the banking system - so with 0% inflation i would expect the banks to collapse…

        And then… I don’t know! Stuff is hard and economics harder…

      • LumpyPancakes@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Most cryptos are deflationary. That seems to cause hoarding.

        Having no inflation sounds good to me if paired with no growth in population, but I know little about economics.

        • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I wasn’t even considering crypto. Thanks for the insightful example.

          That’s an interesting point. I wonder what it would look like if inflation were targeted to population growth percentage rather than a fixed number.

            • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Same. I got one of those large dispensers like dentists use and the corresponding bulk rolls of the nice ribbon style floss to fill it. I only ever use the regular sizes for traveling now. Keeps costs and plastic waste down. I don’t have to think about it for years at a time. It’s a small thing, but I like it.

      • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Wait. It’s possible to actually own a house? I thought only boomers were allowed to. I checked what mortgage I could get. I’m able to purchase a parking spot.

        And 2 homes max.

        Why would you need 2 houses?

        • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          21 hours ago

          A concession to vacation homes. So long as there are enough homes for everyone, I see little problem with it. Restoring the wilderness and everyone learning to camp would be better.

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ok, you get a maximum of 1 sqr feet for that and no paying for a bigger flat.

    • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      If only residential rents really were capped at $1, what do you think would happen? In this scenario, I’m assuming it’s limited to one per household. That is, a family or individual can’t rent multiples at $1, just the one.

      • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        The rental market immediately dries up as everyone with the ability to move into a rental place does so. Owners of apartments and rental houses immediately divest at the earliest possible time since properties are no longer lucrative. In the meantime, they fail to put any effort into the pretense of basic upkeep except whatever makes their rentals sellable.

        The market becomes immediately saturated with previous rental properties now available for individual sale and high supply lowers cost dramatically. The idea of sunk costs makes owners unlikely to sell at rock bottom prices so apartment complexes and the like go out of business, evict everyone and sell their copper from their air conditioners to modestly recuperate the last few months of expenses (water, electricity, leading office staff, etc) and burn them down for insurance money. Single family homes are donated for the use of younger relatives until the market recuperates enough to sell.

        It’s a wild ride for about $24 worth of months for all renters, then, ultimately, the price of housing comes down but renting is no longer a “thing”. Some renters can now afford to buy their own houses (Yahoo!) but without changing the pay structure of society, the most vulnerable of wage workers are now homeless (Crap).

        Or something, idk.

        • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          That sounds about right. Thanks for the thorough response. I wonder if, in that scenario, the government offered a bailout to convert to condos, it would help at all to prevent housing recession.

      • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        if the US dollar crashes then Bitcoin would do the same, with that drawback why not just use the dollar? (I know nothing about crypto)

        • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Less tracking? Marginally lighter physical wallet? Idk, crypto is a scam as far as I can tell. Sure you can make a whole bunch of money and we’ve decided its legal but its somehow both an investment where you can make and lose millions and a currency to pay for absolutely nothing I’ve ever seen. If there was just one or if a few were based around NAFTA, BRICS or EU whatever it could make sense. But every scummy podcaster and 4chan memer makes their own to scam the participants.