Maybe some of you are interested on filling out this survey.
It’s kinda telling, that there is no “Stop implementing AI” options, only how it could be used in a “responsible / open / transparent” way. So I guess they are way past that point? I used the free text fields to express my opinion.

  • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Same, except I used wording line “optional and opt in.” I’m fine with others opting in, as long as I can choose not to.

    • ZDL@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 days ago

      Except that is very much the thin end of the wedge.

      It starts “optional and opt-in”.

      Then there’s an update and it has activated some AI feature “for you”. But you can opt out easily. They’ll even make it easy.

      Then there’s another update and they’ve activated another AI feature “for you” … but this time it’s a pain to disable.

      Then they sneak it in. Probably something that spies on you to feed some model or another. And this one might require deep technical skills to disable. This will be hidden behind another public AI release that they trumpet as the second coming of web browsing.

      All the while their share declines because nobody wants this shit!

        • ZDL@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          I use a spin-off. Zen. There are several others with different focuses. Still the Firefox ecosystem, but Firefox with the stupid stuff gone.

          • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            I haven’t heard of Zen. I’ve heard of Librewolf, Waterfox, and Ice…cat? Ice-something. Probably not the most popular name right now.

            Some say they eat away at Mozilla’s market share. I’m not sure that’s true — what do you think? I figure they all probably identify (user agent) as mozilla. So using them should benefit Mozilla when they go to look at market share or whatever. I just don’t wanna give any ground to Chrome.

            • ZDL@lazysoci.al
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              16 days ago

              I don’t care, personally, if they eat at Mozilla’s (minuscule) share. I use software for my purposes. If it doesn’t suit my purposes I switch to software that does.

              Mozilla lost my trust with the Pocket fiasco. They’ve repeatedly since shown that they either do not care about or do not understand what I use a browser for. (Hint: it’s in the name “web browser”.) When I came across an alternative that worked, and that just as Mozilla started pushing AI crud into their product, I made the switch.

              I owe nothing to Mozilla. They owe nothing to me. But I get to decide which browser I run, and if they want it to be theirs they have to make it something I want to run.