• ikt@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    why are you linking me to articles i read ages ago?

    Nor is smartphone AI going to do the things people what AI to do. It won’t let the CEO take your job.

    You think AI is only useful if it’s taking someones job?

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      why are you linking me to articles i read ages ago?

      Perhaps because you didn’t understand what they said.

      You think AI is only useful if it’s taking someones job?

      It’s why companies are dumping billions into it.

      If the models were actually getting substantially more efficient, we wouldn’t be talking about bringing new nuclear reactors online just to run it.

      • ikt@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Perhaps because you didn’t understand what they said.

        they repeat what i said, did you read them? previously ai model training was entirely based on simply buying more chips as fast and as hard as possible, deepseek changed that

        From your own article

        Is it impressive that DeepSeek-V3 cost half as much as Sonnet or 4o to train? I guess so. But OpenAI and Anthropic are not incentivized to save five million dollars on a training run, they’re incentivized to squeeze every bit of model quality they can. DeepSeek are obviously incentivized to save money because they don’t have anywhere near as much.

        https://www.seangoedecke.com/is-deepseek-fast/

        The revelations regarding its cost structure, GPU utilization, and innovative capabilities position DeepSeek as a formidable player.

        https://www.yahoo.com/news/research-exposes-deepseek-ai-training-165025904.html

        ^ fyi that article you linked to is an AI summary of a semianalysis.com article, maybe AI is useful after all ;)

        If the models were actually getting substantially more efficient, we wouldn’t be talking about bringing new nuclear reactors online just to run it.

        Youtube uses a fuck ton of power but is an incredibly efficient video delivery service

        The growth and popularity of AI and its uses is simply outpacing the efficiency gains

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          they repeat what i said, did you read them? previously ai model training was entirely based on simply buying more chips as fast and as hard as possible, deepseek changed that

          Yes, and it says exactly what I claimed. DeepSeek is an improvement, but not to the level initially reported. Not even close.

          Youtube uses a fuck ton of power but is an incredibly efficient video delivery service

          What a colossally stupid thing to say. We’re not looking at starting up new nuclear reactors to run YouTube.

          • ikt@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            DeepSeek is an improvement, but not to the level initially reported.

            🫠 I cannot be any clearer:

            previously ai model training was entirely based on simply buying more chips as fast and as hard as possible, deepseek changed that