So if you do the Docker setup, obeying the instructions and substituting everything that needs to get substituted, but don’t proofread the files in detail and so miss that line 40 of docker-compose.yml doesn’t have the variable {{domain}} like in every other location you need to write your domain, but instead just says LEMMY_UI_LEMMY_EXTERNAL_HOST=lemmy.ml and so you fail to change it away from lemmy.ml… then, everything will work, until you type in your admin password for the first time, at which point your browser will send a request to lemmy.ml which includes your admin username, your email address, and the admin password you’re trying to set. And, also, of course your IP address wherever you are sitting and setting up the server.
I have no reason at all to think the Lemmy devs have set their server up to log this information when it comes in. nginx will throw it away by default, of course, but it would be easy for them to have it save it instead, if they wanted to. And my guess is most people won’t use a different admin password once they figure out why creating their admin user isn’t working and fix it.
@[email protected] @[email protected] I think you should fix the docker-compose.yml file not to do this.
Edit: Just to increase the information-to-rudeness ratio of my post. The docs are at:
https://join-lemmy.org/docs/administration/install_docker.html
And they recommend using wget to download:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-docs/main/assets/docker-compose.yml
Which is pulled from:
https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-docs/tree/main/assets
Which is what has the wrong line 40 in it.
Edit: They fixed it. Good stuff.
You might be right. I looked at the history and the way it came in, and it’s not as wildly anomalous to the rest of the file when looked at in context. Maybe it’s just a mistake.
if it was inadvertent you’d think someone at the receiving address would have spoken up…
Well, part of the price I pay for being a consistent dickhead is that sometimes people aren’t enthused to respond to me. I get why they wouldn’t really want to respond here and get yelled at, whether or not it was malicious, and instead just fix it and go on.
In my opinion it would be a healthier way to go about things if they were willing to meet criticism head-on, but the pro-authoritarianism position they’ve staked out for themselves is so widely and bitterly unpopular that I think that ship has sailed and they’re unlikely to engage with most of the free-speaking world at this point, because it would just be a torrent of abuse and mockery and so what would even be gained by it.
When it comes to tankies/rightwing/etc/etc I always assume a Reverse Hanlons Razor. Never attribute to stupidity what can be adequately explained by malice.