Brunette6256@sh.itjust.works to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoI dont want to enter a contract when consuming your product..sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square180fedilinkarrow-up11.09Karrow-down110
arrow-up11.08Karrow-down1imageI dont want to enter a contract when consuming your product..sh.itjust.worksBrunette6256@sh.itjust.works to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square180fedilink
minus-squarezkfcfbzr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up421·2 months agoIt says you’re bound by “opening and using” the product, rather than “opening or using”. Have someone else open it for you. Then neither of you have done both.
minus-squarenaught101@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up270·2 months agoThus is the kind of legalistic bullshit interpretation I can get right behind
minus-squareTruscape@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up81·2 months agoContractual malicious compliance let’s go
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·edit-22 months agoYeah but just to be clear, the terms are likely there for a reason and using this product probably has risks associated. The only product I want to use with a liability waiver attached is the bungie cord at the fair.
minus-squareJcbAzPx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoApparently, it’s full of lead.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoWhy would a bungee cord have lead?
minus-squareIncogCyberspaceUser@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoSteel is heavier than feathers
minus-squareCousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24arrow-down6·edit-22 months agoI think it should be “and/or” because if it’s just “or” the terms would only apply if you either open it or use it.
minus-squareSimpleMachine@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoGo one step further and have someone under 18 who cannot legally enter into a contract open it haha
minus-squarebdonvr@thelemmy.clublinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoI think having someone open if for you still counts. You’d have to already find one opened.
minus-squareTaleya@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 months agoLeave it in a workplace fridge with a clear sticker saying “MIKES DO NOT TOUCH”
It says you’re bound by “opening and using” the product, rather than “opening or using”. Have someone else open it for you. Then neither of you have done both.
Thus is the kind of legalistic bullshit interpretation I can get right behind
Contractual malicious compliance let’s go
Yeah but just to be clear, the terms are likely there for a reason and using this product probably has risks associated.
The only product I want to use with a liability waiver attached is the bungie cord at the fair.
Apparently, it’s full of lead.
Why would a bungee cord have lead?
Weight makes you go faster
Steel is heavier than feathers
I think it should be “and/or” because if it’s just “or” the terms would only apply if you either open it or use it.
No, that’s xor
Go one step further and have someone under 18 who cannot legally enter into a contract open it haha
I think having someone open if for you still counts. You’d have to already find one opened.
Leave it in a workplace fridge with a clear sticker saying “MIKES DO NOT TOUCH”