In aĀ report released Friday,Ā the committee said that Ocasio-Cortez ā€œproactively took steps to complyā€ with House rules, including using personal funds to rent apparel that would typically be gifted or loaned to Met Gala attendees.

But the report states that,Ā ā€œdespite Representative Ocasio-Cortez’s significant attempts, the Committee found that she failed to fully comply with the Gift Rule by impermissibly accepting a gift of free admission to the 2021 Met Gala for her partner and by failing to pay full fair market value for some of the items worn to the event.ā€

The ethics panel said it did not find evidence that Ocasio-Cortez ā€œintentionally underpaidā€ for costs related to the event, and that ā€œin many instances,ā€Ā she had relied on a campaign staffer to handle discussions of payment and the advice of her counsel to determine the amounts.

. . . The ethics committee alsoĀ released a separate reportĀ related to Rep. Mike Kelly, a Pennsylvania Republican,Ā and allegations that his wife may have bought stock in a steel company based on confidential or nonpublic information he learned in his role as a congressman.

The committee said that it reviewed allegations referred by the Office of Congressional Conduct and ā€œdid not find evidence that he knowingly or intentionally caused his spouse to trade based on insider information.ā€

But the report said that the panelĀ ā€œdid not receive full cooperation from Mrs. Kelly and was therefore unable to determine whether her stock purchase was improper.ā€

The report concluded by saying that ā€œRepresentative Kelly should ensure that he and Mrs. Kelly divest of all shares of Cleveland-Cliffs before taking any further official action relating to the company.ā€

This some bull shit right here.

    • LilB0kChoy@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      12
      Ā·
      5 days ago

      Odd non sequitur but, yes, he very likely does.

      In case you’re confused though, that is also not fascism, it’s paedophilia.

        • LilB0kChoy@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          4 days ago

          I said ā€œvery likelyā€ because he is not a reliable source/witness.

          There’s a Wikipedia page about all the false or misleading things he says.

          I believe he did but I tend to follow the journalistic two-source rule for definitive statements.

    • amikulo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      Ā·
      5 days ago

      Raped

      I really doubt he has the coordination and blood pressure to do it at present.

    • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      19
      Ā·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      What exactly does that have to do with the subject at hand?

      Fuck me for pointing out the obvious total non-sequitur. Hive mind in action. We get a fresh influx of Redditors or something?

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        Ā·
        5 days ago

        Because they’re throwing everything they can as distractions. There’s a reason there’s been new headlines every time something they don’t like is in the press.

        • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          Ā·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I’m totally with you on that. Most of the daily headlines are just distractions from the child-raping dictator that should be front and center. And by all means I hate the bastard as much as the next sane person. If he were on fire, the only liquid I’d pour on him would be an accelerant. I also think it’s possible that in the midst of all this bullshit, occasionally stuff will happen that’s still just part of the everyday red-tape of working for the government. The best I can tell from this article is that the committee made it a point to state they don’t think AOC acted maliciously here - just some staffer’s fuck-up - and AOC doesn’t appear to even be disputing it.

          So, in this particular instance, just kinda seems like ā€œTrump rapes childrenā€ was OP’s attempt at a redirect when someone asked if they even read the article that they’re sharing - a question which they never did answer; given the reading habits of most people I’ve interacted with on Lemmy, it’s certainly not an unfair question to ask.

          ā€œSometimes a cigar is just a cigar.ā€