

You’re not helping. You might be worse than the idiots. You have the awareness to see what is happening, and this is how you respond.
You’re not helping. You might be worse than the idiots. You have the awareness to see what is happening, and this is how you respond.
putting in the design effort to improve the tools in the ecosystem
They have. The problem is that they generally cause as many problems as they solve. Adding another layer in software is often as harmful as it is helpful.
LLMs are nice in this regard, because they don’t really add another layer, but they do take care of the excessive boilerplate that’s easily understandable.
But… That’s where you’d put this crap. Notepad had one job, and it did it well.
But all of the accusers have, so they just assumed it was everyone.
Being this cynical is uncalled for and doesn’t help anything. Most judges (not this one) care about following laws.
They’re also not really offended. They act that way because it gets what they want.
US Senators under 50. (There are 10 out of 100).
Putin. It’s the only available vote in his state.
P.S. All Demonrats are evil and let’s not talk about Republicans.
P.P.S. Is directly using “Demonrats” too revealing?
Plus all those Dems are in the way of the fascist agenda. Let’s get rid of all of them.
Bernie can stay. Just Bernie. That will be his curse.
Government full of actual Nazis. Clearance Thomas fireselling Supreme Court decisions. Blame Hillary Clinton.
No. It won’t.
If you say the words “jury nullification” before you’re selected, you’ll 100% be disqualified. If you say it after you’re selected… you’ll probably still be disqualified. There’s really no reason at all to say those words anywhere near an actual jury. But you can explain the idea, carefully, and maybe not too explicitly.
A jury is the final arbiter of the law. If you decide that throwing a sandwich does not constitute assault, then it’s not assault.
Because the Justice department is being run by headlines and idiots.
I’m calling his employer.
We’ll see. They still have to live in this world, and they were already rich.
I’ll guess it won’t have been worth it in the end, even for them.
Because I wanted a reliable source of news and they offered it for $2 a month.
I also want to support real journalism.
Welp. I had cancelled after the last debacle, but resubbed on an extremely cheap offer.
I guess I’ll have to cancel again.
It’ll sometimes do dumb and/or redundant or too complicated shit. Pile up a couple of those and your codebase can get unmaintainable fast.
I find if you give it small chunks and keep an eye on it, it’s great.
I think one of my recent prompts was “Create a procedure that creates an example configuration file with placeholder values. If a config file doesn’t exist on start, give a warning and create the example config.”
It also works great as a replacement for an ORM.
I understand how to turn the results of a select statement into an update statement, but the AI does it a hell of a lot faster.
I find if you give it small enough chunks, it’s easy enough to review. And even if you do have to correct, it’s generally easier to correct than it would be to write it all by hand.
Also applies when the dev could know what they’re doing, but just doesn’t care to.
(Hint: If you subsidize eggs, you can make them cheaper.)
Why didn’t Biden think of that? /s