• Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Most people have been trained from a young age to value convenience over basically everything else. People also don’t like to step out of their comfort zone, and not having social media is seen by some as a social taboo and as isolationary by some.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Most people have been trained from a young age to value convenience over basically everything else.

      This is the deal. Yes. People, at least here in the US, equate personal liberty with convenience; which is why you saw people willing to kidnap governors over being forced to wear a facemask, or attacking Red Lobster employees for being slow in bringing another basket of cheese biscuits.

      Also why dead kids aren’t enough to get real progress on gun control.

      I think when these tariffs really roll downhill and the supply chain is reconfigured within the next two years, the real and permanent impacts of Donald’s cavalier and reckless economic policies will be in full effect.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      This is accurate. I have a degoogled phone, no mainstream social media, and Linux OS. I have talked to my wife about the reason for my choices, so she is not ignorant about privacy or data gathering issues. She still uses Instagram and Facebook etc. And while she is a bit alarmed at bill C-2 being tabled in Canada (which would share Canadian private citizen info with the USA) I doubt she will think about it next week.

  • EndOfLine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    23 hours ago

    “Ultimately, arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.”

    — Edward Snowden

  • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I don’t think these people will ever realize anything, not until it severely fucks with their quality of life at least

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      20 hours ago

      already fucked. Frog, boiling water etc.

      Also “No time to protest, need to pay those bills somehow”. And then “Too tired to protest”. I don’t like it but I understand.

    • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It will severely suck very, very soon. As soon as they destabilize govs enough to get away with severe abuse of info.

      Edit: they are destabilizing the ahit out of them quickly. This world is now a nightmare and not worth living in. But yeah, let’s criminalize abortions for kids who parents can’t afford them so they can be condemned to evergrowing poverty, shittier qualities of life, and depression. Yay!

    • Commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The quality of life is already fucked, and that’s what caused those people to rally behind current regimes who promised to fix everything using whatever opportunistic buzzwords like immigrants or national volk, turning to reaction.

      • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I mean the lack of privacy directly fucking them over. They have already proven to be unable to extrapolate actions leading to consequences beyond like 1 or 2 steps.

  • Scrollone@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The French need to bring back public square executions for the ruling class.

    • Commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Sorry sir, we’re all out of feudal aristocracy to execute and proletariat is too busy rallying behind their favorite ruling class public figure, so the best you’ll get is ruling class on ruling class violence, with workers being the ones who die the most as a result and status quo not changing

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    24 hours ago

    We are literally living in a horribly written sci-fi movie with so many incompetent villains, that are all trying to take over at once. Never let anyone have access to your life unless they have a very good reason. You’re not ‘hiding’ anything, you are preventing unscrupulous individuals from exploiting you. Do you leave your car or home unlocked with the keys in the door? Preventing a crime before it happens is the reason Privacy is important.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Do you leave your car or home unlocked with the keys in the door?

      This is the best analogy, but people still don’t get it because those doors & locks are invisible to them. It’s all just technobabble to them, and the companies providing all that are doing their worst to keep it that way.

    • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve tried helping some spicy leftist groups and I’m still floored by how little the groups of people care who should absolutely know better. They will talk a big game but when it actually comes to implementation everyone immediately goes all “nothing to hide” like their years of constant guillotine reacts and memes won’t be pulled out in court the second they try to argue entrapment against some bullshit ci/undercover op.

      I don’t think many people realize how aggressive a digital search warrant can get if you or someone dumber than you fucks around and finds that main character energy. At the end of the day you gotta absolutely minimize the amount of data that’s retained long term on systems.

  • ook@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    You’re too optimistic here. Such people will only realise their error if something bad happens to them that also screams at them that it was only possible because of their privacy eroding. They don’t usually connect the dots themselves.

    • lowleekun@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The UK, the EU and soon the U.S. making it mandatory to give your ID when you want to see anything “NSFW”.

      Maybe also payment processors folding before puritan christian nationalists.

      • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Or visiting trans or other LGBTQ reources. Or aborion, mental health, autism, or whatever else they decice to persecute next.

        This isn’t just a threat to what they don’t like now. We’ve seen how Trump turned perfectly normal things into targets. It’s a threat to whatever they decide they don’t like in the future.

        • lowleekun@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I know, thats whats so fucked up about it. It is advertised as “protecting children” (as always) but just ends up as a censor, ignoring the fact that tech savy people of any age can circumvent this. It is population control, as the masses won’t realize whats happening. Disgusting.

      • AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Thank you. I did read some of the news. Just wanted to know if I missed something.

        Unfortunately, I can already see the term “NSFW” being abused to fit whatever narrative the governments.

        Moreover, it is setting a dangerous precedent for rest of the world, especially countries already leaning towards fascism.

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        also some of the flimsy pretexts that ICE and border control are using to “prove” that people are members of criminal gangs.

    • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Basically, we’ve been waiting since the early 2010s for people in the “i have nothing to hide club” to figure out why they should protect their info. Now, they have built psychological profiles on us all to the point that their surveillance algos know what we are doing before we do. When the government further destabilizes just a little bit, everything we’ve ever done will be used against us. They will ramp up the abise as soon as they can get away with it. God help these company executives who are furries on the weekend and have unicorn tail buttplugs at parties. So many people are going to be cancelled over puritain rhetoric for nonsense tribial quirks that nobody should give af about.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        If they’re coming for us anyway then give them a middle finger instead of a whimper. Wear your buttplug with pride.

  • Embargo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    My boss literally said this to me yesterday. He was also outwardly concerned when I told him I closed my Facebook account and used a VPN.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      That basically makes you a black hat hacker.

      I wish I was joking or even exaggerating.

      But talking, trying to explain does (sometimes) help. Like my boss who at first thought Linux was illegal.

  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I figure they can already simulate what I will do for 300 years, so I don’t bother anymore.

    I also posted my nudes publicly, so they can go ahead and stare…

    • octopus_ink@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      I’d hope current events would be the counter argument. Take your pick regarding country/continent and event. I’m being intentionally vague to ensure I don’t run afoul of the rules of the sidebar, but there are legitimately many examples currently, some mentioned by others in this discussion.

      I should add that events such as “You’ve been doing X which has always been legal for your entire life, but now worldchangingevent or policychange has happened and it’s no longer legal, and they are persecuting people for it” have always been pretty plausible hypotheticals. We just have modern, current examples of how wrong that can go now.