• pappabosley@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Queuing is one way that companies create the perception of scarcity, this leads to people being willing to pay more or buy without comparing the price, due to their fear of missing out. It can also add an air of exclusivity, where people will pay more for an item to convey a VIP status. I’m certain they choose not to scale the servers, the few lost customers wouldn’t be worth the cost when they’re able to price gouge the patient. And once all the stores are doing it, what choice is there?

  • Eczpurt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not only that, but they are also straight up reducing the amount of rewards you get through their system! Payments now yield 2.5% of the cost in equivalent rewards instead of 5%. And you get 5 points on your sign up anniversary instead of 10.

    Things used to be way better when it was $1 off your plan for each year you stayed and for each referral. Now it’s a fixed discount you use points for once every few months, doubled wait times since they cut the benefits in half.

  • Daemon Silverstein@calckey.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    @[email protected] this is nothing new. Back when the COVID-19 pandemics was at its peak, a state-owned Brazilian bank Caixa Econômica Federal created an app named “Caixa Tem”, where people could apply for and receive a governamental aid. The app had a “queue” akin to that one.

    • pappabosley@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      It seems more reasonable to me in that circumstance, as it’s a temporary scenario, they would have little idea of what demand would be and potentially were not able to scale their profit to cover increased load cost.