• Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    I started a conversation the other day with some friends about if I ever ran for President and needed to travel the country, what impact would there be if I decided to go super old-school and get a Presidential train car.

    Side conversation; Airforce 1 is the Airliner the Pres flies on. Marine 1 is the helicoper. What would be the train designation?

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It would be a statement, that’s for sure.

      Major problem is that Amtrak has the lowest priority on our rail network. Getting to a campaign rail-stop on time would be almost impossible without greasing some palms. So you’d have to hook up with a cargo rail line or something like that.

      Edit: Now, if you had “improve rail transportation” as a major platform plank, showing up late would be a feature, not a bug.

      • droans@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Legally, passenger rail gets the highest priority.

        However, the punishment for violating this is a fine which hasn’t been updated in decades. The rail companies realized a long time ago that it’s better to just take the fine instead of actually following the law.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      US-CAR 1 or uscar 1. We’ve had several before so it’s not particularly an abstract.

      They’re all named after great explorers, Marco Polo, Ferdinand Magellan etc.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        So theoretically if we got a new president who was into using trains to get around we could have a high speed uscar1 named Neil Armstrong or Yuri Gagarin? Though I assume astronauts wouldn’t be considered explorers and would be reserved for spacecraft the president is on

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Correct though it’s unlikely any president will travel by train again given the best security is people simply not knowing where you are going or when. Being trapped in one direction is a big no no.

          • TehWorld@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            You KNOW that they’d have a fleet of helicopters, AWACS, fighter jets and vehicle escorts just hanging around the side of the running train.

            • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              imagine getting to be late for school because your bus got stuck at a Presidential Train Crossing, and being able to see the copters and jets fly over.

              • TehWorld@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                Was it McCain who said that he’d campaign in every state but was said to have regretted it because the time to travel to Hawaii, Alaska and a few other states (Idaho etc) were kid of a waste?

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Awful for security. Your whereabouts would be known at all times, and the USSS can’t protect every mile of track.