Hi everyone!
Itās me again)
For those who havenāt heard of it yet - VOID is a local-first, open-source āsecond brainā app. Think of it as combining the flexibility of Obsidian with the structured organization of Notion.
As the title says - VOID just reached 100 stars on GitHub!
Huge thanks for all your support - it truly motivates me to work even harder and bring the project to release as soon as possible.
But this post isnāt only about āshowing off.ā Over the past week Iāve mainly been polishing the editorās behavior, and now Iām finally happy with it. I think itās time to share the roadmap for the next year(I think?):
-
Note linking, global indexing of todos and tags, and embedded content (videos, images, audio, etc.)
-
Migration from Excalidraw canvas to a custom JSON Canvas implementation
-
Databases (similar to Notion)
-
Sync server improvements and a self-hosted Docker container
-
Plugin API (Lua for the backend and any frontend framework you can imagine)
-
Full redesign of the entire app (yes, we finally have a designer!)
-
And of courseā¦ optimization, optimization, optimization
We also now have a Lemmy community where Iāll post small devlogs, thoughts, and some behind-the-scenes updates about VOID. If youāre interested in the project, feel free to join there ā or hop into our GitHub Discussions.
GitHub
And one more thing - the first beta is coming very soon!
Stay tuned!
Admitted, it was a bit reductive and mean, because I was annoyed about the long list of meaningless mumbo-jumbo in the post, without explaining what this app supposedly does / is useful for. If people have something useful to present, why not start with the useful bit of info? āManaging knowledge managementā sounds a bit like the āpresident of the tautology association presidencyā
Iām sorry you werenāt able to understand it, do you need an explain like Iām five?
No, an explanation like you were five wouldnāt improve upon OP.
Youāre really a chummy type, arenāt ya?
Youāre much kinder than I. I think the term āself-centered arseholeā applies here.
You donāt see the humor in you having said, āDo you want me to explain it like Iām five?ā
I thought it was funny. And thatās why they replied the way they did. You were also being very snarky. And who wants assistance from someone being snarky?
This is definitely a both sides are wrong argument. /2Ā¢
ELI5 is a pretty established thing thatās self-evident.
Your comment just now is entirely true, but you completely missed the point.
The funny part is, you basically offered to talk like a child when explaining.
I wasnāt snarky to begin with, and I donāt owe anyone politeness.
āIām sorry you werenāt able to understand itā¦ā, sounds snarky as hell. Thatās victim blaming. The original comment they replied to was indeed a bunch of mumbo jumbo.