• The Menemen!@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Imo this starts to affect productivity. I spend at least 5 minutes every day to click that shit away. Adding the time this costs in my concentration, I’d say I lose easily 10-15 minutes of my daily productivity.

    Then add the “Let’s see if the AI can do this. Oh, yeah, it can’t” and I lose even more time.

  • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    24 hours ago

    The drive to put AI on everything has never been pushed by anyone who genuinely understand the technology.

    It is entirely pushed by billionaires who hate the rest of humanity and want legal chattel slavery from a populace that won’t resist. Hence the push towards AI, regardless that they hallucinate all the time.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    1 day ago

    Look, I know you’ve been using this software for twenty years, and love how it works and what it does, but hear me out: what if we fuck it up? Like, a lot.

  • EzTerry@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    While I’ve found uses for local LLMs (ie I host) and even the bigger chat bots:

    I feel the gen “AI” everywhere is just an excuse to collect data since they always use the online models… And if you are either not paying or paying api rates (per token… Or usually million token rate) it’s basically being provided significantly below cost.

    • oppy1984@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yeah I use chatgpt and Gemini for targeted tasks, data collection and organizing for blog posts and work proposals (yes I verify the data, I know about A.I. hallucinations), and how to’s for tasks I don’t do often or have never done.

      Just yesterday I told it “I just bought the PC (linked to product page) I want to install Linux Mint but first I want to disable secure boot, provide a step by step guide to accomplish this” and after about a minute it spit out and detailed guide referencing the manufacturer’s website, their forum, and a third party guide. It even pulled tips and tricks from the forum with things like “tip: users report if you see this screen do this to correct it (link to forum thread)”

      I’m not giving these access to my email or calendar or anything like that, once I can have a locally hosted LLM that can access that stuff then sure, as long as I can control my data. Until then I just use commercial LLMs as tools that I don’t fully trust.

      • _g_be@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        AI is a tool. Or more exactly, AI is an accelerant. There are things you could have done yourself, but the AI can do it in seconds and now you just have to verify it and modify it. When used to create things within your skill set, more power to ya. Companies are shoving it into their products with no understanding of this.

  • HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    My favorite is scrolling Instagram and then all of a sudden seeing somebody being like," I wanted to bake an apple pie, so I partnered with Meta AI to bake a pie!"

    Because Jesus fucking Christ

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Partnered” is such a bizarre word to use to mean, “I read a recipe”. Even if that recipe was regurgitated in the most inefficient way possible.

      Imagine people in the past saying shit like, “I wanted to bake a pie so I partnered with Betty Crocker.”

      Oh really Brenda? You “partnered” with Betty Crocker? And what exactly did Betty do to help? Oh. That’s right. Nothing. Because she’s not an actual person, just a branded cookbook. Maybe make sure more of the rum makes it in the pie next time.

    • TypFaffke@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I keep reading this “nobody wants AI” talking point. Is that really your experience in the real world? I’m surrounded by people who absolutely love that shit and use it for everything.

      I’m by no means an AI enthusiast, but acting like people don’t want it, why it’s quite definitely the other way around is a bit weird. I feel like critics are inclined to replay the Blockchain playbook of “haha, a product with 0 use cases they try to push into everything”. But with AI it just isn’t applicable.

      There’s so much valid criticism for AI, but saying it’s useless and nobody wants it makes you seem like a lunatic.

      • b-rain@troet.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        @TypFaffke
        I appreciate your input and your perspective. My personal experience is this: One person is rather enthusiastic about GenAI, very few say there might be use cases where it might be useful, the majority does not want or use it.
        I admit that it might not come across very clearly, but i meant to refer to GenAI, not AI as a whole.

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        You’re right, but sadly I think the reason people like it so much is because of how illiterate they are.

  • DearOldGrandma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    A few months ago while shopping, I overheard an elderly gentleman being told by a sales rep that AI is utilized for some feature in the man’s new set of hearing aids. The old man looked so confused, like that one John Cena meme. I felt so bad for the guy

    • EzTerry@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is the biggest problem wifh genai, it takes over the meaning of any other AI… At most theis hearing aid “AI” is a small neural network to remove background (noise) vs foreground (talk), more likely it’s not even that complicated but still focused on nearest conversation and not other noise.

      • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Exactly, we used to call this “digital noise filtering”, and we had it pretty damn well figured out.

        You want to filter sound? Do some simple Fourier transforms and you’re all set. No need for a black-box “AI” model that is likely trained on data generated by a much more simple and efficient Fourier filter.