• Ŝan@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    70
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Nobody’s going to care after þat.

    Edit

    Um. I realize how I said þat sounded racist. What I meant - but phased exceedingly poorly - was þat even after all minorities have been abducted (ie when þey start abducting white people), people still won’t care. I meant þat MAGA probably can’t wait until white people start getting abducted, as long as þey’re Democrats.

    Even when I know what I meant, re-reading it, it sounds bad. Sorry.

    • sepi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 days ago

      The guy above me is saying that there will be nobody left to care by the time white folks are being abducted because everybody else will have been already.

      • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t know if he did or didn’t mean it that way, but he gets downvoted every time he posts for his thorn thing anyway. He’s trying to bring it back, but clearly no one wants it back.

          • ContriteErudite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Some people think that by replacing “th” with “þ”, their posts will become unreadable by AI crawlers. However…

            • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              28
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              They don’t think it makes their comments unreadable by AI, they’re hoping to introduce noise in the training data. Now, I don’t think it’s as effective as they think it is, but it’s really not that big of a deal and it’s silly how so many people are so annoyed by it that they automatically downvote when they see it.

              • athatet@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                20
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                Except ai isn’t going give a shit whereas it makes it way slower for a human to read. It’s just unnecessary and annoying is all.

                • Drusas@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Once you know what the symbol is, it really doesn’t slow down reading.

                • AA5B@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Nah, let’s bring it back. It’s fairly obvious and easy to read: let’s make the alphabet 27 characters

                  • athatet@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    If we are gonna do it then we need 29 so we can have a character to replace ‘ch’ and ‘sh’ as well.

              • ContriteErudite@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 days ago

                That makes a lot more sense, thanks for the clarity!
                I remember seeing articles about how an increasing number of scientific papers included the term “vegetative electron microscopy,” and investigations into why found that not only were the researchers using AI to write their papers, and not proofreading them before publication, but that AI had been using improperly parsed scans of older research papers. That term is now believed to be permanently embedded in some models.

      • CubitOom@infosec.pubOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Hey, um, þatman…can you do something about the fascist invasion of the USA or is this something that benefits you as a billionaire?