• Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      End homelessness = buy everyone a home.

      But the point was more about the fact that he could buy every single homeless person in two countries a house, and still have more than half his current wealth. In your desire to be contrarian, you miss the actual point.

      • eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        No they think giving free houses to someone makes it unfair to them as they think they are the only ones with suffering in life and the “poors” deserve poverty as they don’t work as hard as them.

        I often wonder how miserable it must be to bear such ignorance, malice and unkind, distrustful thoughts in someone’s mind.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Well, they didn’t actually say that, it’s just a very common attitude. Given that they said “permanently end homelessness”, id imagine they meant closer to “cash can’t solve the structural issues that cause homelessness: if you give every homeless person a house, you’ll still have people falling through the cracks and ending up homeless”.

          If they weren’t saying that, then I am. Obviously a bandaid is better than the “fuck all” currently being done, but let’s not pretend that a billionaire can just fix societal level problems.

          • Jtotheb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Agree on point #1, but on point #2 I lean toward “yes they can”. Billionaires’ constant PR campaigns that they conduct to avoid having their heads chopped off are what normalizes a society where people are okay with looking the other way when confronted with such unimaginable wealth disparities. There are limited resources, and the ones that are being hoarded are what will help. Obviously we the people have to do better, but intrinsic in the discussion of why we suck so much at helping one another is the fact that this culture was crafted and nurtured by the people it benefits.

    • valek879@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Send like a cool thing to attempt.

      Like even if someone still wants to sleep outside, a safe place to store your shit so it stays dry seems pretty dope. A place you can show up to when the temperature drops and your shivering and just sleep at with no strings attached…

      Shelter is one of our basic needs, kind of like food and water… Seems like our basics shouldn’t be driven by profit.