• demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    And you better believe of the Democrats gain power the Republicans will scream about the deficit until they are blue in the face and then do nothing. Worthless fucking Democrats.

  • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 hours ago

    We cut all those programs and jobs and the deficit still went up?

    I wonder what happened to all that money they were saving by doing that?

    • Jumi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m sure you wanted to write sarcastic but I can imagine the happenings recently may have left some scars.

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    10 hours ago

    And not a peep out of the party of “fiscal responsibility”.

    Really says something about the Cons, doesn’t it.

    • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah they’ve been pushing that false narrative while being the reason we keep increasing our spending while also cutting revenue for DECADES.

      • Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        54 minutes ago

        Eisenhower was a Republican and he used social programs to build the US interstate highway system and the infrastructure necessary for the predecessor to our modern airport infrastructure and space program.

        The highest top marginal tax rate during Dwight D. Eisenhower’s presidency (1953-1961) was 91%, which applied to the highest income bracket. (Note: In 1952 and 1953, the top rate was 92%, dropping to 91% for 1954–1963.)

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Oh no, this train is not slowing down. It can’t. In fact, it has to speed up. At least, the currency debasement has to speed up.

  • jaykrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Unstoppable debt spiral. Basically this, the more people come to realize it’s never being paid back, the faster it will grow, and the faster it grows, the more people realize it’s never being paid back. It doesn’t really mean anything at this point.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Even if that were true, you can’t escape the consequences

      https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/061515/what-are-some-historic-examples-hyperinflation.asp#%3A~%3Atext=Hyperinflation+is+a+rapid+and%2Cits+currency+value+became+worthless.

      Is the U.S. at Risk of Hyperinflation?

      There would need to be a significant and highly unlikely drop in production and a massive increase in circulating currency for hyperinflation to occur in the U.S.

      You my think that paragraph on the us is encouraging, but consider today’s reality

      • disruption caused by general tariffs government investments, and the government reneging on commitments is quite likely to cause a sudden drop in production. There is a lot of recession talk
      • the current administration is trying to force the federal reserve to effectively print money, create a massive increase in circulating currency by cutting interest rates, total Y the opposite of what you need to do to control inflation
      • jaykrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 minutes ago

        We can’t completely escape the consequences, but they can be mitigated. I don’t have a lot to lose. I don’t benefit from a 401k or social security. There’s a reason why investors are flocking to gold.

        Something that needs to change is how real estate is seen as an investment. It has broken the quality of life increase in the US by gatekeeping real estate, drastically increasing cost of living, while building nothing new to preserve investment. When you make housing an investment, it becomes in your best interest to stop building more to reduce supply and preserve value.

        • Laser@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Surely there’d be no other downsides

          But yeah inflation outpacing interest is mostly good for the borrower.