Independent Senator Bernie Sanders floated Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as a potential presidential candidate in the 2028 elections, saying that even though it’s “her decision to make,” she is a “very, very good politician.”

Speaking to Axios, Sanders said that he has been “out on the streets with her” and noticed how she responds when people come up to her. “It’s so incredibly genuine and open.”

Ocasio-Cortez is seemingly positioning herself to run for higher office, whether it is challenging Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for his seat or to make a run for president.

  • Prizefighter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I saw this coming a mile away and I hope she does win the Presidential Election to break barriers and to end the nonsense going on currently.

    Problem is the conservatives will argue/debate no woman should be in power followed by countless historical references to prove their point. Then someone will show even more historical references of conservatives causing twice to three times the issues. This will turn into one giant circle jerk of why they (conservative) won’t listen to a woman when they don’t even listen to their own parents.

    • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      The greater risk isn’t misogynist republicans IMO, it’s misogynist liberals who will cynically use her gender and ethnic background as examples of her unelectability instead of addressing their opposition to her populist agenda.

      I don’t take issue wither her being a woman, but dumb rural americans will, so we can’t nominate her”

      Every time a populist candidate gains momentum in the democratic party, democrats suddenly become greatly concerned about electability. See: Obama, Sanders, Mamdani, Fatah, ect.

      Maybe if democrats placed as much emphasis on a popular policy agenda as they do on identity, they wouldn’t have as much of an electability problem.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The greater risk isn’t misogynist republicans IMO, it’s misogynist liberals who will cynically use her gender and ethnic background as examples of her unelectability instead of addressing their opposition to her populist agenda.

        See: This comment section. Same thing happened with Obama, same thing happened when Warren was briefly leading the 2020 primary. Demographic fretting always seems to go hand in hand with whether the candidate is talking about change.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The greater risk isn’t misogynist republicans IMO, it’s misogynist liberals who will cynically use her gender and ethnic background as examples of her unelectability instead of addressing their opposition to her populist agenda.

        Spot on.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        It was wild seeing the libs blame lower turnout among black people for Hillary’s loss.

        At no point did they question what policies lowered turnout, or address that white people, including women, voted Trump.

    • iridebikes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yep. I would love AOC to win but there’s no chance in America for that to happen. Our populace is deranged.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The people who would especially hate her would never vote for a non-republican anyway so ya’ll just need to get over it and just go for all-in.

        • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Utterly boring “safe” candidates on the supposed left is how we got here in the first place. Give me a straight-up Marxist, just not with that messaging. And who would they be running against, Vance? Ha

        • iridebikes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Third female candidate in four election cycles. I dunno, feels like we are asking to lose. And again, I would love to vote for her. Just don’t think the populace can muster it. I have lost all faith in Americans. The hope from Obama’s terms is completely gone.

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Yea, it wasn’t the support for genocide or the fact that she was running around with Liz Cheney for a lot of the campaign. Nope, it was all because she was a woman.

            Be serious.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Obama was charismatic. Clinton and Harris were not. That’s the killer difference between them, not that “black/Muslim” was somehow an easier demographic to sell than “woman”.

          • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            20 hours ago

            The fun thing about intersectionality is that you could also look at her as the first latina candidate

            But looking at what her politics are is somehow never the consideration. In terms of platform, she could hardly be more distinct from either Clinton or Kamala. I like the odds of popular socialist policies much, much better than focus-group tested middling capitalist policies.

            • iridebikes@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Most lemmings do. But it’s about who can finish. I’ll vote for the candidate furthest to the left for as long as I can.

      • SeriousMite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        She’d face the exact same misogyny that Harris did, the difference though would be she’d have a strong enthusiastic volunteer base behind her. I think if the election is fair she’d have very good odds.

        • iridebikes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          21 hours ago

          We tried Clinton. We tried Harris. I know the conditions are different, but do we really want to risk it when abject fascism is the consequence?

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            We tried neoliberal. We tried neoliberal. Can we really risk it when fascism is the consequence?

            Notice how you only focus on a single one of their shared characteristics to say it’s too risky?

          • Triasha@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Running a milqtoast centrist is just fascism with extra steps. They will do nothing of substance and then people will vote for fascists to enact change.

            • iridebikes@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              I agree but the issue isn’t what is right. It’s about getting the candidate over the finish line.

              • Triasha@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                I’m not going to go for fascism with extra steps when there is even the slightest chance of something better.

          • SeriousMite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            21 hours ago

            I think having an authentic populist voice is more important than any race or gender considerations. We simply don’t have another candidate that can do this as credibly as AOC. I think if she runs, in the primary, she’ll handily beat out Newsom, Pritzker or any other white guys in the party who are in a position to run.

          • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            Yes!? Clinton was the worst possible candidate for that election and Harris just isn’t a good politician and was utterly sabotaged from Biden among other things waiting waaaaay too long to drop out.

        • iridebikes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Hillary won the popular vote and still lost in a system where the popular vote doesn’t matter. We have a rigged system. I voted for Hillary. It’s not that I don’t have faith in our candidates. I don’t have faith in the system and my fellow Americans.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Seriously. A bland corporate candidate who gave the opposition two decades of lead time to build up an opposition strategy. One of the worst candidates to have run of all time.