• skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    We call this an eye for an eye approach and it will continue until the whole world is blind…

  • ieatpwns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This dumbass couldn’t tell you what nuclear testing was if you explained it to him like he was 5

    • pigup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      “I don’t give a fuck, something racist, several n words. It’s gonna help me stay in power and that’s all I care about and the only thing that matters.” - child rapist president dump

  • Pyr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Are they trying to figure out what the expiration date is on nuclear warheads? The fuq are they still needing to test for?

    Let’s just blow up our arsenal for the heck of it boyz, it will make for a good twitter post!

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Orange Don wants to make sure he can launch them the next time someone calls him names, without anyone being able to stop him

  • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 hours ago

    “Was department”

    ROFL! He’s like a little child in a cardboard fort, pretending the furniture is a threat.

    Someone needs to put him in a home where he can pretend to be whatever he wants.

  • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 hours ago

    That guy is an absolute fud! He sees some other moron do it, and thinks he has to do it too so he looks “alpha”… Talk about your beta bitches, jesus christ.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    This is horrifying. Like, mind-bogglingly bad.

    It’s also a blatant lie. Other countries are not testing nuclear weapons, they’re running simulations. We didn’t do that in the 60s because it wasn’t possible, but the US (and presumably China/Russia) literally have giant supercomputers for this purpose now.

    …And we would know if they were doing real testing because it would show up on seismographs.


    But who cares about truth? Or sanity? No, all my relatives (even scientifically minded ones) won’t even bat an eye, lest some Democrat steal their retirement, ugh.

    • nekbardrun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Good time to remind that, in all History, only one country used nuclear bombs in a war.

      Twice!

      For “Research Purposes” ™

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Trumplethinskin is too stupid to understand any of that . He desperately wants to to be the one to trigger a spectacular overreaction and turn another country into glass.

      #smallcarrotproblems

    • notarobot@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      You have to. He didn’t start weapons testing for defense he’s going to go into war and take the offensive

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 hours ago

      There’s always the mass-extinction asteroid option to look forward to.

  • DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    A giant waste of money. 800 nukes is plenty for pretty much anything and launching 100 would probably mean the end of life as we know it on planet earth. If you wanted to blow a bunch of money on the military there are better ways to do it.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      100 would probably mean the end of life as we know it on planet earth

      It would alter the course of human history for sure, but it wouldn’t actually end human civilization. Just being annoyingly pedantic after growing up in the cold war and learning about such cheerful topics as fallout patterns and blast wave radius and how to fashion air purifiers from an early age.

    • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      True, but don’t tell them that, it’s better if they waste money on useless nuclears than genocide technology.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      If you wanted to blow a bunch of money on the military there are better ways to do it.

      Ohh we got you fam.

    • Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Do you mean 100 all at once? Because we’ve been averaging 26.5 per year for the last 80 years

      • DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Hmm I don’t think so. If it is true those are over the ocean or something. I mean an attack with 100 missiles would destroy nearly any country. Russia is especially vulnerable because they only have a couple of cities with any population in them. Modern nukes are 50-75x the yield of the ones they dropped on Japan. There are all kinds of externalities. They can poison the ground water for generations. They can kill any life feeding in the area. They can cause fallout which is like a radioactive dust cloud covering everything. It isn’t good.

  • rayyy@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just shows he is desperately trying to create many more distractions from the Epstein files to see what works.