The Trump administration will undoubtedly appeal, possibly all the way to the Supreme Court. But for now, millions of people across the country will not have to make hard choices about how to feed themselves and their families. Several states that had already declared emergencies to tackle the impending crisis will have at least some temporary relief.

  • zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 days ago

    At some point I expect the admin to admit they already spent the money. What will the courts do then?

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That wouldn’t do anything at all. The government simply spends money into existence. If the judge tells them to pay SNAP, then they magic the money into existence.

      The federal government cannot run out of money, it can only increase inflation.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        No that just opens opportunity for more delay by saying “the right thing”. At that point MAGAts can say they cant spend money Congress hasn’t allocated, and is blocked on the shutdown.

        In this case the executive does have a certain amount of money already allocated by Congress that they can spend to support critical government functions. Part of that was explicitly allocated to fund SNAP in case of a shutdown. But they’re also making choices like spending billions on ice and border patrol to terrorize dark skinned people and to suppress voting. Are those really critical government functions? Should they really be higher priority than keeping citizens from starving?

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nothing. It will have been a “presidential duty” immune from consequences, as ordained by the bootlickers in the SCrOTUS.