If you weren’t already super psyched for the Big Beautiful Bill borrowing caps making law school unaffordable for many, get ready to learn that most lawyerly public service is no longer getting loan forgiveness. Because public service itself is going to ā€œillegal.ā€

The Trump administration’s ongoing war on the legal profession continues with the Department of Education releasing its finalized Public Service Loan Forgiveness rule — a process kicked off in March when Trump issued his Restoring Public Service Loan Forgiveness Executive Order — and while its impact will be felt across education, the new rule is especially brutal for law school graduates, with the DOE cutting off forgiveness to those causes it deems to be supporting ā€œillegal activity.ā€ And, if you hadn’t already guessed what it means to support ā€œillegalā€ activity in this regime, they mean jobs like ā€œrepresenting immigrantsā€ and ā€œadvocating for transgender rights.ā€

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    21 hours ago

    Wouldn’t this also include any form of defense law? Sounds like you wouldn’t even be able to represent anyone in court who is being accused of ā€œillegal activityā€, without losing your loan forgiveness.

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      Ā·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      This is the point - authoritarian regimes make absurd laws that are vague and impossible to follow, so that prosecution can be fully politically-selective.

      They will decide after the fact, without any objective standard, if your legal conduct is ā€œillegalā€ for loan forgiveness purposes. (Maybe also criminal charges purposes, but I think they’re saving that for next year after we all get used to this step.)

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        Ā·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Except this isn’t even a law.

        It wasn’t passed or voted on by Congress.

        It is a guideline, from the Dept. of Education.

        So… yeah that’s not a law, and thus… nothing can be said to be ā€˜illegal’ when not in compliance with it.

        Had we a functioning government and legal system, that was not headed by a Supreme court that lols at the idea that precedent matters… well you could probably argue that this rule is itself illegal, unconstitutional.

        But, alas, the law and order President actually just means that the law is whatever he says it is, so… moot point.