• Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      No, it’s that he was a hebephile instead of a pedophile.

      There is a distinction between the two, they are both still fucking bad.

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          No, I’m not — I was disgusted to hear Megan Kelly try to draw some kind of positive distinction between “barely legal types” and “children”.

          Personally I don’t consider the distinction between terms to be meaningful beyond human need to categorize. A 12 to 16 year old is still a fucking child, a 17 year old is still a child. There are plenty of arguments to make about whether 18 year olds are adults.

          That being said, nothing about my comment suggests that I support the message they’re trying to portray. Maybe read the entire comment before calling me a conservative next time, ok?

          • mudkip@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 hours ago

            It’s the same old defense heard from conservatives everywhere. He’s not a pedophile, he’s a hebephile. Whatever

        • fodor@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          … And this, my friends, is a perfect example of Poe’s Law.