Democrats’ resounding victories in the New Jersey and Virginia governor’s races got most of the headlines, but the most dramatic results in last month’s elections were downballot. In Virginia, Democratic challengers flipped 13 seats in the Virginia House of Delegates, to secure their largest majority in the chamber in four decades. New Jersey Democrats grew their margin in the assembly by five seats—winning their largest majority since Watergate. Coupled with the party’s string of upset victories and double-digit shifts in special elections last year, the results have some party leaders dreaming big.
How big? A new post-election analysis from the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, which supports Democratic candidates in statehouse races, argues that the current electoral climate presents the best chance in years for Democrats to consolidate power in blue states, flip battleground chambers, and loosen Republicans’ grip on power in solidly red states like South Carolina and Missouri.
By the group’s calculations, Democratic candidates over-performed the partisan leaning of their districts this fall by an average of 4.5 points—a shift that would put as many as 651 state legislative seats in play across the country in a midterm election year, and position the party for a bit of long-awaited payback.
This country has a major reactionary problem. Too often we see blue and red waves as a reaction of either conservatives shitting on Democrat presidents on TV/social media or reality punching common people in the gut under Republican administrations. There has to be a way to keep voter’s disgust of Republicans in place year over year.
There has to be a way to keep voter’s disgust of Republicans in place year over year.
There was, but democrats voted against him twice.
It’s like the DNC is playing a version of Pascal’s Wager for political parties: if the country still exists in the future, its only interest is to be positioned to capture the most power it can. If it doesn’t exist, oh well, that’s a problem for physical people to worry about.
In sure they will snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in the end.
As long as they actually follow the will of the people, not the will of the corporate donors, they can win. That’s the one thing they need to change.
Ah, so we’re boned then.
As we’ve been for around the last 10 years.
We don’t do that here.
We mostly just try to choose the ones with corporate donors that are the least bad. To be a bit more serious, with things like the Citizen United decision, I honestly don’t see how anything else would be feasible any time soon.
Yeah. If we ever get a Supreme Court worth anything, we need to get that overturned in a hurry.
Zad$ <
Removed by mod




