• UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    22 hours ago

    They generally don’t though because the burden to indict is SIGNFICANTLY lower than the burden to convict. Anyone that you cannot even get an indictment for isn’t likely to be convicted at trial.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yeah, except that dealing with a legal defense costs a lot of time and money. So even if they can’t convict they can use the courts as a means to punish.

      Really shows how much our legal system needs an overhaul to prevent abuse like this.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Which is the whole point of grand juries.

        We’ve gone for a century with prosecutors being afraid to test the grand jury because it’s embarrassing to miss and mostly pointless.

        Now we’re seeking out fake prosecutors who don’t give a fuck.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Because embarrassment is not a thing in US politics anymore. Turns out it was pretty much the only thing holding everything together.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          also grand juries take significantly longer time to be seated than regular trial, enough to hurt working people financial situation, that arnt well off for jury service.

            • jacksilver@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Yeah, I wasn’t disagreeing. My point was that the norm was not getting an indictment on a grand jury was embarrassing and hurt someone’s career. This disincentivized prosecutors from repeatedly bringing a case to a Grand Jury. But Trump and his cronies don’t care, breaking the norm, and will keep pushing to get what they want.

              • Serinus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                That was the norm for the past century. The norm for centuries before that was that the King could fuck whoever he likes, metaphorically or literally, for any reason.

                They’re bringing back old norms.

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        There’s no defense at a grand jury hearing. So at least that’s free. Likely not stress free.

        • jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          My point is Trump can keep brining it to a Grand Jury cause it effectively costs him nothing. It only takes one grand jury to indicate and then Trumps political enemies (Comey/etc.) are forced to pay legal fees (amongst other things).

        • jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          My point is Trump can keep brining it to a Grand Jury cause it effectively costs him nothing. It only takes one grand jury to indicate and then Trumps political enemies (Comey/etc.) are forced to pay legal fees (amongst other things).