• Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      BEVs would weigh less than most of these oversized trucks and SUVs, especially with the added lift kits, dualies and oversized wheels

      Chevy Bolt weighs about 3600lbs

      Ford F150 starts at over 4500 lbs going up to 5500lbs for the gasoline models. (Another source says that the Lightning is around 6000lbs)

      Chevy Tahoe starts at just under 5500lbs and goes up to nearly 5900lbs

      Kia Sportage (a below-average sized ICE crossover) weighs 3300-3800lbs depending on the configuration

      So spot-checking it seems taxing by vehicle weight would impact oversized vehicles more than it would impact BEVs. Particularly if it was structured as “vehicles over 4,000 lbs, vehicles over 5,000 lbs and vehicles over 6,000 lbs” or even better something exponential beyond 4,000 lbs.

      Combine this with a tire diameter registration fee (combined diameter of all tires on the vehicle, so dualies cost 50% more on top of the extra cost of 20"+ tires) and we should start getting somewhere with financially incentivizing smaller vehicles

      • Grabthar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        My point was that BEVs can weigh significantly more than their equivalent ICE car. The goal should be to get rid of ICE completely and use BEVs where personal transportation makes more sense than mass transit. There is already too much of a push to make ICE cars more desirable than BEVs. I have serious doubts that taxing vehicles by weight would do a better job of keeping these monstrosities off the road than their own cost plus the price of gas does, but putting our legislative thumb on the scale yet again to discourage someone considering a small BEV versus a small ICE car seems shortsighted.

    • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      It can help make up for the loss of revenue from gasoline taxes. Roads have to be paid for somehow, and ideally the burden will fall on those owning vehicles and not society at large.

      • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Very True, vehicle weight also has a direct relationship with how much wear and tear they cause.

        People buy much bigger batteries than they actually need anyway.

        • NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I’m in the UK, could you have a word with our Gov pls? They’ve just announced that my 90kg electric vespa will cost 3p/mile the same as my friends 2500kg BMW iX :(

            • NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Probably running them as taxis for that sweet sweet free charging zone! :)

              I have to apologise to the Gov, either they’ve changed their mind, clarified or it was just vicious rumour but it appears electric motorbikes won’t incur the per mile charge… woo hoo

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s bs, gas taxes already don’t pay for road maintenance and too many localities seem to want to over-tax EVs

        Let me counter-propose

        • EVERY road vehicle be taxed by weight and mileage to cover road maintenance
        • IN ADDITION keep a smaller gas tax to help pay for the additions harm to society and the environment of burning fossil fuels, AND to discourage this kind of behavior

        This is fair to everyone - each covering their actual usage and damage caused, regardless of technology

        Of course then we can go off into the woods arguing that actual trucks cause essentially all road damage but we do need those

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It can help make up for the loss of revenue from gasoline taxes.

        UK is already going to tax EV owners from 2028 to make up for lost petrol revenue. Electric Vehicle Excise Duty or eVED.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      2x the weight, 16x the street damage. But honestly, does every BEV need to be able to go 600 miles in one go?

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        The only ones that do are the attempts at extended range full sized pickups. They have an argument that it’s needed for towing and I imagine at least some actually tow.

        My EV gets over 300 mile range and is lighter than any full sized pickup. I’d argue that’s a sweet spot since I can drive five straight hours on a road trip, about the same as for a gas car.

        • aim_at_me@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          That’s because its a hummer with a 250kwh battery. That’s just a choice someone has made. Not all BEVs weigh that.

          The Tesla model 3 weighs about the same as a BMW 3 series.