• 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    246
    ·
    1 day ago

    My great grandma had a similar story, the bus stop was in front of my grandparent’s bedroom, they hated that people would gather in their bedroom window. she asked for the stop to be moved a few meters down the road, so it is between the houses and not in front of it. the municipality denied her.

    Until that point the bus stop was nothing but a sign, she heard that they were going to remove it and install a proper bus stop with a bench and shade.

    She asked the city build it a few meters down, still nothing.

    the night before they began construction, my great grandma just moved the sign to where she wanted it. they built the bus stop where the sign was, and today, that bus stop is still where she wanted it to. Possibly until perpetuity

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      102
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Possibility: They know it’s in the wrong spot. They don’t know why. So they figure someone screwed up, they don’t know who, but they don’t want it to be them or their department. So nobody says anything, and the stop remains unchanged.

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          60
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          We have no knowledge of why it was there in the first place, we’re only given one side of the story. Maybe this was closer to a crosswalk, or nextdoor was less safe. We don’t even know if the stop existed there before she moved in. We don’t know. All we know is old lady didn’t like view of people outside her window and decided that instead of dealing with it she had to change it herself.

          • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Your defense is entirely based on speculation that makes your side look correct, when you simply made it up out of thin air. That is not a legitimate position.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            21 hours ago

            We have no knowledge of why it was there in the first place

            So you admit you have no knowledge of this, yet assume it fucks the public to have it moved a few feet to the left?

          • sfgifz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            We also don’t know if the entire story is real. We don’t know why you are so triggered by it.

          • shneancy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            or maybe the city council couldn’t be bothered to move the sign a few meters to the left, and the fact that the construction still went through and nobody complained or pointed out any possible problems means that it was a non-issue

          • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            38
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            you are free to give it the worst possible reading. it is a story I heard from family of events that happened maybe 70 years ago. the stakes couldn’t be lower. unless you figure which municipality and bus stop were talking about, then you can complain and have the bus stop reinstated in front of the bedroom I might inherit someday

            • angband@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              High stakes indignation, the highest possible. People with real problems don’t get that high.

              • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 hours ago

                it was a trivial problem with a trivial solution. a complete non issue.

                if it’s a trivial problem with hard solutions, then suck it. if it’s a real problem with trivial solution, then fix it already.

                but trivial problem with a trivial solution? that’s just good enough for a family anecdote.

            • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              32
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’m forced to give it the worst possible reading because we don’t have the other side. Personally, I read this as some HOA type who can’t be bothered to have a few people milling around while waiting for the bus.

              • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                21 hours ago

                I’m forced to give it the worst possible reading

                You’re literally not, in any way, forced to do that. That is a decision you have made.

              • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                1 day ago

                For context I got a picture of the place in google maps. and discovered that said bus station is no longer there at all, but I have marked were the bedroom is, the original location (straight in front of their window. and the exchanged location, no one was inconvenienced by that change. and albeit it was a minor inconvenience for my great grandparents, the fix was trivial.

                • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  41
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  To me, that’s even less of a reason. They could still see in, she could still see them, I side with the city still. What was the point of moving it except wasting taxpayer money?

                  • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    21
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    How exactly was any tax payer money wasted? the whole exchange cost nothing at all.

                    And siding with some municipality Karen from the 50s is one hell of a specific hill to die on. lets face it, you are objectively wrong. despite the non existence evidence and records of this event, you are still wrong.

                    Chances are the municipality did not want to spend the funds (practically costs nothing) to move a sign a few metres, but it mattered a lot to the residents. and when they had to rebuild it, then it would have been free to move. instead they were stubborn and lazy and all it took is a bit of direct action.

                  • Horsecook@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    13
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    From the look of it, I’d say that the distance from the window to the bus stop doubled. The perceived sound level of people at the bus stop would have declined by 75%. Which could be the difference from lying in bed, able to clearly hear the conversations of people waiting at the bus stop, to an imperceptible murmur of background noise.

                    These sort of minor changes are not frivolous, they can have a huge impact on the quality of life for someone.