Not only do the elites get away with doing anything they want, they get away with filming themselves committing crimes and bragging about it openly. The same elites that jail you for buying cunny because it’s “immoral” not only don’t go to jail for doing the same thing with kids but can get elected to the presidency after getting caught. How is the average person ok with this level of hypocrisy in society? Why aren’t they rioting?
You don’t get 20 years in jail for littering.
maybe op was doing it a lot
and/or the litter was plutonium or something
edit: I think the phrasing was intended to be hyperbolic
You know why. The powers that be places a lot of value on him, and nothing on you. If you are just a debt slave, you are insignificant to the matrix.
Even if you would be rich, you wont get into the club of leading the world unless you sold your soul as well.
Evil runs the world but thats the game here - will you let yourself become evil also, or will you be a hero and stay good despite the system?
Money.
what kind of littering was that extreme, if you were dumping chemical waste, or dangerous things, i can see that?
Why aren’t they rioting?
The same reason you aren’t.
the protests pretty much showed as that. organized, predictable, no wants to ruffle feathers.
can you explain this littering thing im interested i love crime
Troll account. Dude’s history is atrocious and it’s been only one day.
Where are you getting 20 years for littering?
Maybe he was littering by throwing away Top Secret Confidential documents on the floor of the Russian Embassy.
Or maybe he was littering by throwing away a strangely shaped metal spheroid on a public street through a stranger’s chest cavity.
One word, classism.
It’s cause you’re poor.
That’s not even a joke. Those scumbags are the single richest people in the world so they can just buy their way outta any legal trouble
Those scumbags are the single richest people in the world so they can just buy their way outta any legal trouble
literally. the trump trial just before the elections was the essence of this. the judge said he is guilty and wished him godspeed.
(and he probably didn’t even get any money, he was just scared to be epsteined after the elections.)
And the legal system is often a country-club insider system where they protect their own.
Yup. There are currently ~180 billionaires in the Virgin Islands for a NYE mega-yacht party. Those ~180 people collectively represent ~80% of the entire nation’s wealth.
…anyone got a nuke?
well kane in cnc3 did that to the allies, waited till all the “heads of govt” in space and nuked them taking them all at once. its probably some parallel we can draw from.
Seriously, if ever there were a time for war crimes in the Caribbean
War crimes in the Caribbean… man the pirates franchise is getting dark
Because the ideas of responsibility, accountability, integrity and honesty is a joke to all of them. They pretend to be scared of repercussions for their actions but once they’re on the brink of doing yet another law-breaking action, they throw their arms up and do it without a care. It’s because they can afford it, if not wealth, then just power.
Trump is also a murderer of negligence, 350k people died under his watch while fumbling a pandemic. So he’s a murderer and a rapist.
Your name was listed in a list of people who littered? Yeah that’s 20 years.
All you have to do is have your lawyer call you a “pillar of the community”.
Edit: Oh and be a rich, white, cis man willing to call yourself straight and christian. That part is important.
The problem is you have failed at least one, probably both, of the foundational rules of any capitalist society.
First rule of capitalism: Be rich. Second rule of capitalism: Don’t be poor.
In other regimes there are three rules: first be rich, second don’t be poor, third don’t contradict the leader or the party.
4th, never contradict or critcize copaganda, or militaryganda because you will be seen as unamerican and its twisted to make you look crazy if you did.
Wilhoit’s law:
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
In looking up the exact text, apparently it is often attributed to the wrong Wilhoit, lol.
